SV: [Elecraft] Re: K3 question re dual receive

Ken K3IU kenk3iu at cox.net
Wed Aug 15 13:48:20 EDT 2007


This is what Wayne posted on Aug 9th.
73, Ken K3IU
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

On Aug 9, 2007, at 3:13 AM, Bill Tippett wrote:

>/
/>/
/>/ N6KR:
/>>/ The KRX3 subreceiver can either share the main receiver's RF path or 
/>>/ get its signal from the unused KAT3 ATU antenna jack.
/>/
/>/ Can't we use the RX antenna port on the $79 KXV3?
/
Hi Bill,

If there's no KAT3 installed, you still have a few options.

Normally, the sub will share the RF path of the main receiver, and that 
includes the RX ANT. I.e., if the main RX is running from the RX 
antenna jack, then the sub will, too, if it's sharing RF.

You can switch the KRX3 to its auxiliary input, but if you don't have a 
KAT3, the question is what to connect it to. The present KXV3 doesn't 
have provisions for routing RX ANT only to the sub. But there are three 
other sources you could use for the KRX3's aux input: (1) the SO239 at 
ANT2 (normally supplied only with the KAT3, but you could order one and 
install it just for the sub); (2) a BNC jack, below ANT2 (labeled "AUX 
RF" and not normally supplied, but we could provide one on request); 
(3) the BNC jack on the KXV3 normally targeted as the buffered I.F. 
output (but you'd lose I.F. out capability).

Also, if there's enough demand for an antenna-switch-only version of 
the KAT3, we could offer one in the future. You'd then be able to 
connect the KRX3 to the unused antenna jack, as with the KAT3.

73,
Wayne
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
N6KR



Björn Mohr wrote:
> I wrote a week ago or so;
>
>   
>>>> I plan to use my K3 primarily for low band dxing, so RX antenna
>>>>         
> switching will be crucial.
>
> Actually I am a little confused as to how RX signals are routed. The reason
> I ordered the KRX3 option was to get RX antenna functionality. Basically I
> want to be able to have my TX and RX antenna separated and have the choice
> to listen to one or the other or both simultaneously.
>
> Should I cancel the KRX3? <<<
>
>
> I realize there was an error in my text, I am not questioning my order of
> the second RX but I what I wonder is if the KXV3 transverter interface will
> bring anything to the table when it comes to the second RX. I have not
> ordered the tuner as I don't see any point to tuned on the radio end of the
> coax...
>
> My question is, how do I get the functionality I need as described above.
>
>
> 73 de Björn /SM0MDG


More information about the Elecraft mailing list