[Elecraft] Is the K3 capable of ESSB?

[Thom LaCosta]

On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 N2EY at aol.com wrote:

>> Marvelous idea...logical too...and flies in the face of operating
>> efficiently.
>
> How so? The transmitter would be more efficient. If it's OK to use 6 to 9 kHz
> for ESSB, why not 15 or 20 kHz for FM?

Ah good point...and once 20 kHz is established, we can go for subcarriers to 
handle various types of data....
>
>
>> But, that notwithstanding, with limited spectrum space available, even
>> after the
>> expansion of the phone bands, why are we considering reducing the number of
>> channels available, by increasing the bandwidth?
>
> I like how 15-20 kHz wide FM sounds. Why can't I use it?

Well, I feel good when I releive abdominal and/or bladder pressure.  Why can't I 
do it anytime I want in public?

>
> If they don't want us to drive us fast, why do they make such cars? And why
> do the speedometers go up so high?

'Cause consumers can be dumb as a box of rocks?  Maybe it's a male thing 
(remember the fins on cars, and the protuding front grilles?). Of course there 
is the axiom "Mo' is bettah".

>
> (devil's advocate mode = off)

Wow, another religious statment...

73 k3hrn
Thom,EIEIO
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer

www.baltimorehon.com/                    Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
www.tlchost.net/hosting/                 Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month