[Elecraft] ESSB from a K3

[Brett gazdzinski]

That's why I never use ssb, it sounds nasty, even ESSB.

There is NO reason to run narrow ssb if the band is wide open,
what is that hurting?

I am glad I can still run AM, which sounds good and is easy to
build equipment for.

Some people seem to think its important to always use
the minimum bandwidth for communications, but I don't think
that would be ssb at all....

I don't bother to get on when things are crowded, although
CW would be fine on a crowded band.


Brett
N2DTS



> -----Original Message-----
> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net 
> [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Fred (FL)
> Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 9:22 PM
> To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: [Elecraft] ESSB from a K3
> 
> OK ...........
> 
> What good is ESSB?  For good, bad, illegal - 
> K3 is capable apparently of generating it, in
> some mode.  If one can't transmit it, legally
> or ethically - why for heavan's sake - would
> I want the capability to receive it?
> 
> Are us poor hams, destined to have 2.7khz
> or LESS, forever and a day?  Does SSB, as it
> did in 1964 - have to sound a little limited,
> a little hard to read, a little squeakier
> than those good ole AM rigs?
> (boy this ought to get some posts!)  :)
> 
> Fred
> N3CSY
> 
> 
>        
> ______________________________________________________________
> ______________________
> Got a little couch potato? 
> Check out fun summer activities for kids.
> http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activit
ies+for+kids&cs=bz 
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    
> 
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>