[Elecraft] Re: Hexkey
David Wilburn
dave.wilburn at verizon.net
Sat Apr 14 16:08:12 EDT 2007
You are right on Ron, as I try to use a light touch. I think I would
like many of the magnetic paddles. The HexKey is an affordable version
of the magnetic, that has an immense (5lbs if memory serves) weight.
Add to that the good looks and an Elecraft sticker to go with my K2, and
it gives it class.
David Wilburn
dave.wilburn at verizon.net
K4DGW
K2 #5982
Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
> Why would you reverse the normal "thumb for dits, index finger for dashes"
> setup? That's been standard since the first bugs and carried over unchanged
> into the paddle/keyers.
>
> It sounds like you are running into an essential difference in sending that
> has shown up since keyers became common. Although both bugs and keyers
> typically use side-by-side paddles, there are substantial differences in how
> they are operated. A bug requires significant mechanical force and movement
> to operate the dit pendulum to make dits and then stop them at the right
> moment. Several designs have attempted to reduce the demands of a mechanical
> bug, but it's still a huge amount of movement and energy compared to simply
> accomplishing the contact closure a keyer needs.
>
> Many newer CW ops who never used a bug developed a preference for very
> close-spaced contacts that can be operated with a feather touch on the
> paddles. That's completely at odds with the action needed for a bug.
>
> Many paddles designed for use with keyers - particularly the earlier paddles
> - featured movement and springs much like a mechanical bug: lots of throw
> and relatively stiff springs. They were operated like a bug - usually
> rolling the whole arm side to side with the fingers held steady to contact
> the paddles with sufficient force without wearing out one's finger muscles!
> The original Vibroplex paddles were one of those designs, like my Scotia and
> HamKey paddles.
>
> Then came the "light touch" designs designed to work with an absolute
> minimum of movement and force. The Bencher was an early one. People used to
> a mechanical bug tended to knock them apart just sending a CQ! Newer
> operators learned to hold their arm still and lightly caress the paddles
> with their fingertips. Used that way, they work fine.
>
> I can't speak for the HexKey. I use my Speed-X or Vibroplex Bugs at home and
> my KXPD1 paddles in the field where it's not practical to haul a bug. The
> KXPD1 paddles, by the way, are able to deal with my fist without complaint.
>
> The bottom line is that it all comes down to how you want to operate the
> key: strong rolling fist like a bug operator or the feather touch of a keyer
> operator? If the former, you need to find someone who has really pounded on
> the HexKey to be sure it will survive long.
>
> There was a secondary problem with the first Bencher that deserves checking
> on any modern paddles. The Bencher uses a single spring that is stretched
> around a chrome-plated post in the back. Bumping the key in just the wrong
> way would dislodge that spring, causing it and the paddles to fly off of the
> base! I suspect the designer assumed they'd be treated like a bug - NOT
> bumped! The sensitive springs and pendulum of a bug can be damaged by
> careless handling, but operators not used to bugs tended to assume the
> paddles were as structurally sound as any straight key. Not so,
> unfortunately, and dropping or banging a Bencher was inviting time spent
> looking for the spring and paddle mechanisms behind the operating desk or on
> the floor somewhere.
>
> Ron AC7AC
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Gil Gibbs
> Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2007 10:27 AM
> To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: [Elecraft] Re: Hexkey
>
>
> Gents;
>
> I'm in the process of relearning how to use a paddle, having only
> gotten the feel of a Vibroplex keyer three decades back from an old pal.
> I'm now stumbling around with a Bencher paddle, the first of the line
> that's of the "fall apart" design, and thus I have to be careful about
> how I handle it, which distracts me from training myself to use "thumb
> for dashes, finger for dits", and my brain isn't as young as it used to
> be to do multitasking. Thus the question - does the Elecraft/Bencher
> Hexkey actually perform better than "the original", and thus make the
> price worth adding to my gear? I'd really like to have more versatility
> in sending, not worrying about knocking the contact points off their
> mounts, which are conical points for hinges, and the darn things are an
> annoyance to have to remount.
> Any input will be appreciated, many hours to go before I can become
> fluent with my old favorite CW again, having been too lazy to get away
> from voice until now!
>
> Tnx, 73's
> Gil WA5YKK
>
>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list