[Elecraft] RE: KPLUS (K3) Needed .....
rt_clay at bellsouth.net
rt_clay at bellsouth.net
Wed Sep 27 11:30:35 EDT 2006
As another contester, I can add the following
1. Better tx alc control. It's adequate for qrp or 100W usage, but too rough if you have a low-drive linear (like with an 8877 tube)
2. TX power should not be zero after a band change (this is a pain for SO2R)
3. separate transmit mute line
4. easier to use dsp: it's basically impossible to adjust during contest conditions.
During contests I control the xtal filter selection, AF filter selection, and RX antenna from the keyboard via software.
ps: I did the encoder swap to get faster tuning rate. That and a finger dimple helps, but it still could be faster.
Tor
N4OGW
>
> From: "DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL" <dougzzz at gmail.com>
> Date: 2006/09/26 Tue PM 08:12:05 EDT
> To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: [Elecraft] RE: KPLUS (K3) Needed .....
>
> Heh heh heh...this is why we are still waiting for the next
> iteration...lack of consensus.
>
> I don't see anything different with your wish list compared to the K2
> with options other than the "bigger mechanics" and GC rx (which I
> don't want).
>
> Speaking as a contester (a rare breed among qrpers), my wish list includes:
>
> 1. Faster tuning rate without having to resort to 0.1kc steps. A
> bigger knob would be fine, but not really mandatory if the rate were
> faster. Yeah, I know about the after market swap. Even my FT817
> (with an itsy-bitsy knob) tunes faster and just a smoothly.
>
> 2. Completely independant VFO's (ie, all parameters separate, such as
> my pet peeves, mode and filter selection). PLEASE PLEASE
>
> 3. Optocoupled RIT/XIT with "clear" button. MANDATORY!!!!!
>
> 4. Freq readout for both VFO's and RIT/XIT offset (three separate
> displays) GOTTA HAVE IT.
>
> 5. A faster/easier way (front panel knob) to adjust the sidetone/cw
> offset would be nice. This is a fatigue fighting tool. Going via the
> menu isn't terrible, but not efficient for contesting. Sometimes you
> just need a change of pace. NICE TO HAVE, but I could live w/o it.
> Also, since contesters use a computer for keying, swapping this
> function with the keyer speed would be just FINE with me. I know it's
> a loser for the portable crowd.
>
> Frankly, during contesting, you don't twiddle the controls much. The
> VFO moves all the times. If you are running, the RIT is always
> moving' and you may pump in/out to a narrower filter setting (and it
> would be real nice to SEE that displayed full time also).
>
> If you are playing around with PBT or IF shift or DSP or NR, well, you
> are not winning the contest.
>
> As for SSB (which I don't much care for), an external AF to RF to AF
> clipper would be fine. Internal RF clipping even better. Of course,
> that would mean purchasing the SSB module. LOL
>
> de Doug KR2Q
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list