[Elecraft] KPLUS (K3) Needed .....

John Reiser reiserj at optonline.net
Wed Sep 27 09:12:30 EDT 2006


In my humble opinion, we don't need a K3.  I'm perfectly content with the K2 
as it is.  It does evrything I need from a rig, and does it well.  I would 
probably never use the stuff people want to add.  (By the way, besides being 
a QRPer and CW man, I'm an advanced DXer.)

I am in awe of the engineering that went into the K2.  For one thing, just 
look at the way the case fits together.

If I had one nit-pick, I wish the ad-hoc point to point wiring of some 
components (key click filter, etc.) were not necessary.

 73,

John, W2GW

K2/100 #5570, K2/100 #4970, K1 #2105, KX1 #1258, KAT100, etc.



> [snip...]
>> But it seems pretty evident that Elecraft should
>> seriously pursue creating a K3 base rig, with at
>> least:
>>
>>     K3 HF Transceiver
>>     consider including VHF
>>     100W pep minimum included
>>     CW, SSB included
>>     .. then other options if need be
>>     a real NB
>>     DSP in the IF, somehow standard
>>     consider GP coverage in receive
>>     larger front panel, knobs and buttons
>>     LCD color base display
>>     KITTED product
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
> 




More information about the Elecraft mailing list