[Elecraft] KPLUS (K3) Needed .....
John Reiser
reiserj at optonline.net
Wed Sep 27 09:12:30 EDT 2006
In my humble opinion, we don't need a K3. I'm perfectly content with the K2
as it is. It does evrything I need from a rig, and does it well. I would
probably never use the stuff people want to add. (By the way, besides being
a QRPer and CW man, I'm an advanced DXer.)
I am in awe of the engineering that went into the K2. For one thing, just
look at the way the case fits together.
If I had one nit-pick, I wish the ad-hoc point to point wiring of some
components (key click filter, etc.) were not necessary.
73,
John, W2GW
K2/100 #5570, K2/100 #4970, K1 #2105, KX1 #1258, KAT100, etc.
> [snip...]
>> But it seems pretty evident that Elecraft should
>> seriously pursue creating a K3 base rig, with at
>> least:
>>
>> K3 HF Transceiver
>> consider including VHF
>> 100W pep minimum included
>> CW, SSB included
>> .. then other options if need be
>> a real NB
>> DSP in the IF, somehow standard
>> consider GP coverage in receive
>> larger front panel, knobs and buttons
>> LCD color base display
>> KITTED product
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list