[Elecraft] K2 QSK
Ron D'Eau Claire
rondec at easystreet.com
Sun Feb 19 15:52:21 EST 2006
Tony, N2TK wrote:
Hi Ron,
... this is an individual thing. Some folks don't care for QSK and some do.
It's no right or wrong, just a preference. To me a perfect QSK rig would be
one that I could send at any speed and I could clearly hear between the dits
without any artifacts such as clicks, and pops and no agc pumping.
---------------------------------------------
Thanks Tony. I can see the application in DX-ing at times. I appreciate your
insights.
If hearing between dits wasn't so intrusive to me, I'd use faster QSK, but I
find that it's not needed for the sort of operating I do so I was curious
about how it was being used by others.
I've always appreciated QSK - being able to hear between my "signals" - and
enjoy what I consider the K2's very smooth QSK. But then I can remember when
good "QSK" meant that the receiver AGC recovered within 5 seconds and I no
longer had to throw antenna and B+ switches to change between xmit and
receive.
It's a matter of what extreme you want, and the K2 is a good rig to push to
extremes. Wayne and Eric surely support it and the rig has been made
consistently better because of grumbling over issues like this.
Ron AC7AC
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list