[Elecraft] WSJ article

Dave Balla orion129 at hotmail.com
Fri Sep 9 10:38:38 EDT 2005


   There's enough blame to go around, but I'm blaming 1's and 0's.  In my
   opinion,  it's  the  root cause of the world changing.  Some call this
   process  Globalization. I know. I was there. I laid off hundreds. Then
   I got laid off.

   We can jam a lot of 1's and o's into a digital pipe and transfer it in
   nanoseconds.  We call it bandwidth. It's much easier now for a digital
   receiver to read a signal sqare wave that goes up for a 1 and down for
   a  0.  Now  we  have  digital video and satellite T.V.  And so can the
   poorest of nations around the world.

   Satellite  T.V.  for the economically poor-the 'have-nots'-opened up a
   window  on  the  world.   Now  they  saw  for  the first time what the
   "have's"  really  had,  how they lived, their freedom and culture, and
   the  cars  and  trucks  they drove.  Then the 'have-nots' decided they
   wanted  some of this and a better life.  So they decided to work for a
   meager  wage  and change.  American companies liked this because their
   stock  holders  wanted  the  stock  to  rise and pay bigger dividends.
   Reduce  labor  costs  was  the  mantra of the 90's.  Send it to Mexico
   where  a  welder  makes  2.50  an hour versus 23.50 in the U.S.  In 15
   years  Thailand  went from a rice producer to being the second largest
   producer   of   pick   up   trucks,   and   the   fourth   largest  of
   motorcycles.......in  the  world!  We know where GM and Ford are right
   now, don't we? One night while watching National Geographic Explorer a
   shoeless  peasant  in  the  Amazon digging in the mud for gold nuggets
   walked  to  his  grass  hut to check the spot price of gold on the New
   York Stock exchange via the Bloomberg channel.

   Many  of the 'have-not' countries can't get all the jobs from the U.S.
   or  elsewhere,  so  are  starting  to  get frustrated and mad at their
   leaders.  The  Middle  East is a good example.  Amy Chua calls it "The
   World  on  Fire."   Who would have imagined that a lousy 1 and 0 would
   have this impact on jobs and raw emotions.

   Demand is up for these developing countries because they was big shiny
   cars  and  maybe  a pickup truck.  Just like the millions in China are
   buying  right now.  If Wal-Mart where a country, it would be the third
   largest trading country in the world with China.  The Chinese want oil
   from  the same place we get ours. And the other have-not countries are
   going  to  want  it some day too.  More politics.  See how 1's and 0's
   got us into this?  Who would have thunk it?

   Then  we  hooked  our  computers  to  the  Internet.  More 1's and 0's
   running  around the world.  Instant post offices.  Instant transfer of
   money  to the have-not countries and withdrawl from failing countries.
   Instant  drawing  transfers  and  engineering  changes.  Take software
   development:   In  1977  IBM was developing the same piece of software
   AROUND  THE  WORLD.  Programmers from Beijing sent their work over the
   Internet  at the end of each day to Seattle.  Then they zapped it over
   the  net  5,200  miles  to  Belarus  in Latvia.  From there it went to
   Bangalore,  India  who  passed  it back to Beijing by morning, back to
   Seattle  and so on 24/7 in a global relay that never stopped until the
   project   was   completed.    Think  Ten  Tec  does  this????  Have  a
   manufacturing  problem  in  a foreign plant these days?  Just get on a
   video conference  call.  Sell your airline stock.  NOW.

   Globalization,  exporting  of jobs, foreign investment, huge increases
   in  demand,  pressure  from stock holders, Iraq, Afghanistan, the rise
   and  fall of ham radio manufacturers in the U.S.:  I'm blaming 1's and
   0's.

   73's DAve, KW4N
     _________________________________________________________________

     From:  N2EY at aol.com
     To:  n5ia at zia-connection.com,
     kenharker at kenharker.com,lacosta at bcpl.net
     CC:  elecraft at mailman.qth.net
     Subject:  Re: [Elecraft] WSJ article
     Date:  Fri, 9 Sep 2005 06:18:56 EDT
     MIME-Version:  1.0
     Received:  from      mailman.qth.net      ([63.238.179.60])      by
     mc7-f20.hotmail.com  with  Microsoft  SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 9
     Sep 2005 03:20:11 -0700
     Received:  from   mailman.qth.net  (mailman.qth.net  [127.0.0.1])by
     mailman.qth.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6BA859C99;Fri, 9 Sep 2005
     06:25:15 -0400 (EDT)
     Received:  from        imo-d22.mx.aol.com       (imo-d22.mx.aol.com
     [205.188.144.208])by   mailman.qth.net   (Postfix)  with  ESMTP  id
     E1BD1859C14for <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 06:25:06
     -0400 (EDT)
     Received:  from          N2EY at aol.comby          imo-d22.mx.aol.com
     (mail_out_v38_r5.3.)  id  z.1e6.436c1583  (4222);Fri,  9  Sep  2005
     06:18:56 -0400 (EDT)
     >In a message dated 9/8/05 5:14:53 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
     >n5ia at zia-connection.com writes:
     >
     >
     >  >  Just  look what the Walmart Super Stores and the Home Depot's
     have done to
     >  >  the local grocery stores and hardware/lumber yards.  And what
     Mc Garbage has
     > > done to the local burger joint.  It's the power of advertising.
     > >
     > >
     >
     >I disagree!
     >
     >It's  the  power  of people's buying habits, plus the economies of
     scale, plus
     >competition.
     >
     >Wally  World et al survive and flourish because people - customers
     - take
     >their business from the established stores and bring it to WW.
     >
     >The short-term gain is that WW can offer lower prices and a bigger
     selection.
     >The
     >long-term consequence is that local businesses are wiped out.
     >
     >And it's not just local businesses. The big chains dominate the
     >manufacturers,
     >forcing  them to cut costs or lose the contract. (Look what WW did
     to
     >Rubbermaid).   They   go   "overseas"  for  products,  forcing  US
     manufacturers out of
     >business.
     >And then folks wonder where the good jobs went...
     >
     >Also  in  order  to  keep  costs down, quality is sacrificed. Also
     serviceability,
     >so that you have to buy a new one because the old one wasn't meant
     to be
     >fixable.
     >
     >--
     >
     >We saw a version of this happen in amateur radio 30-odd years ago.
     The
     >old-line  US  ham  radio  manufacturers were mostly pushed off the
     shelves by imported
     >rigs from Japan. The same happened in "consumer electronics".
     >
     >Fortunately  a  few US ham mfrs. survive, like TenTec. The success
     of Elecraft
     >is
     >proff that at least part of the market looks beyond the price tag,
     at things
     >like simplicity, performance, serviceability, etc.
     >
     >We  don't  just  vote  at the polls - we "vote" economically every
     time we buy
     >something.
     >
     >73 de Jim, N2EY
     >_______________________________________________
     >Elecraft mailing list
     >Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
     >You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
     >Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
     >  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
     >
     >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
     >Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


More information about the Elecraft mailing list