[Elecraft] Dropping the Code Test

[Chuck Mabbott]

Check out the following nets  http://www.aa8vs.org/nren  both CW and Winlink

http://www.qsl.net/w8ihx  CW net been running since '35.  The nets are 
running and traffic is being passed and ops are standing by to assist  7.050 
and 14.050 Just need to get the word out.....


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vic K2VCO" <vic at rakefet.com>
To: "EricJ" <eric_csuf at hotmail.com>
Cc: <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 1:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Dropping the Code Test


> EricJ wrote:
>> Despite this oft repeated myth, CW is RARELY ever used in emergency
>> communications.
>
> ...these days.  It certainly was in the past.
>
>> Otherwise, no one there could come
>> up with a single emergency services group using CW ops for any purpose.
>
> ...because it's hard to find competent operators.
>
>>  I would be
>> willing to bet during the worst moments of the current crisis in the Gulf
>> states that nobody was heard to utter the words, "If only we could get 
>> some
>> CW ops in there with battery power rigs." It just doesn't happen.
>
> I've heard over and over in news reports that 'there's no communications', 
> people can't find out if their relatives and friends are OK, etc.  This is 
> EXACTLY the kind of situation in which CW operators with battery powered 
> rigs would excel.
>
>> Consider that amateur radio emergency services must interface
>> with other services whose operators don't use CW and you can see it just
>> isn't very useful for emergency communications in the real world.
>
> Health and welfare traffic can be independent of other services.  And why 
> can't the interface consist of a ham handing a piece of paper to his 
> other-service counterpart?
>
> Having handled traffic by CW in the dark ages (somewhere I have a BPL 
> medallion) I can tell you that phone cannot come close to the efficiency 
> or accuracy of CW in handling formal traffic.  And there is, or should be, 
> a structure that already exists for them to fit into -- the ARRL NTS --  
> which would provide connections to these operators.  Frequencies, 
> schedules, liasons, all should exist.
>
> The problem is not that CW wouldn't be useful, it's that there aren't 
> enough competent CW operators who know how to handle traffic.  And many of 
> the ones that do are age 60+.  Most of these guys aren't up to being 
> helicoptered in to stricken areas.
>
> -- 
> 73,
> Vic, K2VCO
> Fresno CA
> http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com