[Elecraft] balun
Vic K2VCO
vic at rakefet.com
Tue Oct 11 18:25:10 EDT 2005
mc wrote:
> there is comment on the
> balun pages that says there is no real good balun for low power, my
> question is why not, is it not the purpose to keep everything in balance
> to get the best out of your antenna no matter the power. the eham site
> does not offer any explanations on this but one HAM operator says DXE
> balms claim to fame is high power out puts.
If the balun is inefficient, the loss will be the same in DB at QRP or
QRO. If the balun has a loss of, say 3 DB, then it will make your KW
sound like 500 watts and your 5 watts sound like 2.5.
Having said that, power loss is power converted to heat, so you might
not notice a lossy balun when operating QRP; at QRO it would heat and
possibly burn up.
Finally, a balun may be more or less effective at reducing common mode
currents (that is, converting between balanced/unbalanced), apart from
losses. And one balun may have a wider frequency range in which it is
efficient and effective than another.
So there is definitely a sense in which one balun is better than
another, even for QRP.
--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list