[Elecraft] RE:K7C - Let's keep this radio oriented

[Carl J. Denbow]

I agaree with all of this, except having the new text below the previous 
remarks.  It's much easier, IMHO, to use reverse chronical order.  You 
see the most recent and relevant post first, then if you want to see the 
background and earlier comments you read backwards through the posts.  
With the "post-below" option, one has to scroll all the way through 
stuff you may have read before, just to see the new comment.  And, if 
you haven't read it before, it's still easier to read the current 
message and then decide whether you are interested enough to see what 
came before it.  I suppose, to some extent, this is a matter of style, 
but I believe what I've said probably is true of a majority of posters.

73,

Carl
N8VZ

Fabian Kurz wrote:

>Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote:
>  
>
>>ALSO: Please edit out the majority of copied text on your replies
>>to postings. 
>>I'm seeing a lot of postings with a ton of unnecessary text that takes
>>up a lot of room - especially for digest mode readers of the list.
>>    
>>
>
>A very good point! Not only removing the unneccessary parts of a
>message you reply to is important, it is also very important NOT
>to reply _atop_ the original message but _below_ it.
>It's much easier to read the message when proper quiting was used,
>even if one didn't follow the thread closely.
>
>This following snippet from the Wikipedia article on this topic pretty
>well illustrates the problem:
>
>,----[ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting ]--- 
>| Because it messes up the flow of reading.
>| > How come?
>| > > I prefer to reply inline.
>| > > > What do you do instead?
>| > > > > No.
>| > > > > > Do you like top-posting?
>`---------------------------------------------------
>
>The same with proper quoting:
>
>,---------------------------------------------------
>| > > > > > Do you like top-posting?
>| > > > > No.
>| > > > What do you do instead?
>| > > I prefer to reply inline.
>| > How come?
>| Because it messes up the flow of reading.
>`---------------------------------------------------
>
>looks pretty fine and is easy to read!
>
>When there are more than two people involved in the discussion (which
>is always the case on a mailing list or an usenet newsgroup), it is
>also recommended to use a proper attribution line above the quoted
>text to see who wrote what, like 
>
>,--------------------------------------------------- 
>| John Doe wrote:
>| > How do I quote properly?
>| Like this! 
>`---------------------------------------------------
>
>There are numerous articles about proper quoting on the web, like the
>Wikipedia article mentioned above, http://pub.tsn.dk/how-to-quote.php
>and many more. 
>
>Sorry if I sound like a smart ass, but taking the little extra time to
>properly edit a message before sending it makes the mailing list
>significantly easier and more comfortable to read!
>
>73,
>  
>