[Elecraft] K2 BFO Test
Ken K3IU
kenk3iu at cox.net
Thu Dec 8 16:29:02 EST 2005
Sverre:
This fix (that you describe) worked for me on a K2 that I built within the
past year. The LOW BFO freq was just slightly high and putting a low value
cap as you describe lowered the LOW freq to within specs, didn't change the
high BFO freq, and did not cause any instability. I don't remember the exact
value cap I used and the K2 is no longer here for me to look at.
73,
Ken K3IU
-----Original Message-----
From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Sverre Holm
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 4:07 PM
To: w3fpr at arrl.net; elecraft at mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: RE: [Elecraft] K2 BFO Test
> -----Original Message-----
>
> The preferred method of padding the BFO capacitors is to maintain the
> ratio between C173 and C174 by paralleling them with capacitors. A
> single capacitor from the junction to ground will be in parallel with
> the series combination of
> C173 and the varactor D38 and could make the BFO less stable than it
> should be.
>
Don,
How about a single capacitor (1-4 pF) from the junction of the crystals and
the L33 inductor as in
http://www.ac6rm.net/mailarchive/html/elecraft-list/2005-08/msg00562.html?
Does that create potential stability problems also?
I've got this link on my K2 mods page and just wanted to make sure I can
recommend it and keep it there. I have never had any problems with BFO range
myself so I have no personal experience with this myself.
73
Sverre
LA3ZA
http://www.qslnet.de/la3za/
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list