[Elecraft] K2-CW-Filter-Response: is that ok?
Vic Rosenthal
vic at rakefet.com
Tue Apr 26 12:25:09 EDT 2005
Karsten Eppert(DK4AS) wrote:
> I have set the wide CW-Filter (Fil1) to 1,5 and aligned the BFO to a
> pitch of 700 Hz. I applied HF of constant frequency to the
> receiver-input with a signal strength that generated S9+10 db max. and
> plotted the S-meter versus variation of the VFO from high pitch to low
> pitch in 100 hz-steps. So I could determine a filter-curve. What strikes
> me is, that even at very low pitch-frequencies there is hardly
> attenuation and even at zero beat the S-meter still shows approx. S3.
> Turning the VFO "behind" zero-beat lets the S-meter decrease but it
> takes another 300 Hz until S0 is reached. The tone of the "wrong"
> sideband remains audible at even higher frequencies.
There's probably nothing wrong with your filter. If you wish to have a wide CW
filter setting, you should locate the BFO during the CAL FIL adjustment so that
the filter passband is higher with respect to zero beat. If you use Spectrogram
-- see <http://www.n0ss.net/index.html#Spectrogram> -- you can see this graphically.
With correct adjustment, you should not hear any signal on the 'wrong' side of
zero beat.
--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list