[Elecraft] FREQ. AND WWV ???
Masleid, Michael A.
[email protected]
Tue Mar 2 11:30:01 2004
Hi James,
First things first: Do what Don says.
Now, on to your questions:
>a station on let's say 3936.00 sounds
>about the same as that station on 3935.98 on the K2.)
OK, you are about 20 Hz off at 4 MHz, or 5 parts per million.
>what sounded correct was...approx. 9999.32 Usb
>and 10000.53 Lsb on the K2
So, (10000.53+9999.32)/2 =3D 9999.925, so your off by 75 Hz at 10 MHz,
or about 7.5 parts per million.
>(if I tune to 10000.00 Cw mode and use my spot
>func. 9999.91 sounds about zero beat.)
And this is off by 90 Hz, or about 15 Hz from the USB/LSB measure.
Chalk some of this up to D/A converter resolution setting BFO frequency. =
>K2 reading 21.120.00 C
>zero beating the signal on the 990 reads 21.120.13
So you are off by 130 Hz at 21 MHz, or about 6 parts per million.
OK, 5 ppm, 7.5 ppm, 6 pmm, lets call it 6 ppm average.
>I guess my question is this: Is the freq. (c22) off by 130 hz ??? if =
so,
>why does it only seem to be 20 hz on sideband??
Well, all of the calibration is based on what C22 was doing back when =
you
calibrated the K2, so it is fair to say the C22 was set wrong by
6 parts per million. Since C22 should be set for about 4 MHz, it was =
wrong
by 6x4 or 24 Hz too high. - Which is about what you saw on 80 meters (4 =
MHz).
If C22 was set wrong when you calibrated, the amount of error goes up at =
the
higher frequencies.
I'm not saying that C22 was set for 4,000,024 though, just set 24 Hz too =
high.
From what I've seen, dial calibration comes out on the low side if you =
set C22
to exactly 4 MHz. Try about 13.3 Hz less than 4 MHz, or use Wayne's =
method, or
one of the other ones on Don's web pages.
There's a lot of thing that come together to make the K2 accurate. It =
is a
learning experience!
73 de Michael, AB9GV