[Elecraft] Morse code for "@" (prosign 'AC') -- radio interview

[email protected] [email protected]
Tue Feb 24 11:37:14 2004


Sending AT for @, let me see if you send AT as a prosign you get W.  If you send it any other way is it just that 'A' 'T' not to be confused with 'A' 'T' as part of callsign, last name, etc.

The prosign AC sent as single character will be distinctive and when used 
to it will be second nature like the ',' and '.' and '?' There be no
ambiguoity..  My .02 and I am done and how about the thread is about done also??

73 

--
         _________      
 _______/ Chuck   \_________
|                           |
|     www.aa8vs.org/nren    |
================================
The pessimist complains about the 
wind; the optimist expects it to 
change; the realist adjusts the 
sails."
    -- William Arthur Ward
> At 10:05 PM 2/23/2004, KI7V wrote...
> >It appears to me that just sending the word "AT" is faster than sending the
> >new @ character(.--.-.).  I question if this is an advancement to the morse
> >character set.
> 
> AT is ambiguous. Quick, what's this email address: PATHATATFLATCAT.COM?
> 
> To avoid ambiguity, you would need to send an additional two word spaces plus a 
> letter space, so where /AC takes 23 dot times to send, sending _AT_ would take 
> 25 (counting before and after spacing. (dot=1, dash=3, intracharacter space = 1, 
> letter space = 3, word space =7)
> 
> /AC = 3113131113113 = 23
> _AT_ = 7113337 = 25
> 
> Mike 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list: [email protected]
> You must be subscribed to post to the list.
> To subscribe or unsubscribe see: 
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Elecraft Web Page: http://www.elecraft.com
> Also see: http://www.elecraft.com/elecraft_list_guidelines.htm