[Elecraft] my ISP sucks

[Dan Barker]

Rejected:

Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60] by visioncomm.net with
ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-8.03) id A57316730080; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:10:43 -0500
Received: from 209-6-232-31.c3-0.nwt-ubr1.sbo-nwt.ma.cable.rcn.com
([209.6.232.31] helo=[192.168.1.100])
	by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #3)
	id 1APkGY-0003XV-00
	for dbarker@visioncomm.net; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:10:42 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v606)
In-Reply-To: <ACEFLOBGLHKJENIOFALFIEAEJBAA.dbarker@visioncomm.net>
References: <ACEFLOBGLHKJENIOFALFIEAEJBAA.dbarker@visioncomm.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <0869C865-21B5-11D8-83B2-000A957A0178@bc.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David A. Belsley <belsley@bc.edu>
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] my ISP sucks
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:10:42 -0500
To: "Dan Barker" <dbarker@visioncomm.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.606)
X-RCPT-TO: <dbarker@visioncomm.net>
Status: U
X-UIDL: 363032330

Accepted:

Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60] by visioncomm.net with
ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-8.03) id A620167B0080; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:13:36 -0500
Received: from 209-6-232-31.c3-0.nwt-ubr1.sbo-nwt.ma.cable.rcn.com
([209.6.232.31] helo=[192.168.1.100])
	by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #3)
	id 1APkJK-0003uD-00; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:13:35 -0500
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:13:33 -0500
From: "David A. Belsley" <belsley@bc.edu>
Reply-To: "David A. Belsley" <belsley@bc.edu>
To: Dan Barker <dbarker@visioncomm.net>, Elecraft <elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: FW: [Elecraft] my ISP sucks
Message-ID: <2147483647.1070014413@[192.168.1.100]>
In-Reply-To: <ACEFLOBGLHKJENIOFALFIEAEJBAA.dbarker@visioncomm.net>
References:  <ACEFLOBGLHKJENIOFALFIEAEJBAA.dbarker@visioncomm.net>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.0.3 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-RCPT-TO: <dbarker@visioncomm.net>
Status: U
X-UIDL: 363032331

VERY INTERESTING. All the "interesting bits" are identical. The rejected
headers contain a "for" at the end of the second Received clause. The quotes
around the common name in the addresses are missing on the one that is
accepted. That certainly shouldn't matter. The 192 (private) address
concerned me, but it's the same in both. Content-Disposition is missing from
rejected. Shouldn't be required.

Possibly the (Apple Message framework v606) after the mime version is
confusing the software. This is definately not a problem of your ISP. This
is an issue for the Elecraft boys. Hopefully there is enough information
here for them to see why your notes don't work. It VERY CERTAINLY isn't
reverse lookup or ReplyTo!

Good Luck. I'm off to the Mall (good choice of day, no), so I can't follow
up withyou for a while. But there is a lot of mental horsepower on this
reflector. I leave you in their hands.

Dan / WG4S / K2 #2456
IMail, SLMail, Exchange, Notes, blah blah blah KWHD.