[Elecraft] RE: KPA100 "negative resistance" -- more
Clay T. Whitehead
[email protected]
Mon Nov 17 13:39:07 2003
Thanks for the thorough report. I feel better now. Maybe the instructions
should say to put a piece of dark paper or electrical tape over the power
transistors before taking the resistance measurement. Will be interesting
to see what the physicists among us report.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Ward Willats
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 1:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Elecraft] RE: KPA100 "negative resistance" -- more
Hello All:
I sent Tom e-mail last night when I just finished basic assembly of
my KPA100 and was performing the resistance checks on page 41. I too
discovered the dreaded "negative resistance" on the high current 12v
input, J3, and part of last night's exchange found its way onto the
list this morning. (My collector measurements on the PA finals were
goofy too.)
Tom (and others) spoke of this in some July 2003 posts (mine is -2K
ohms on a 20K ohm scale after a lot of settling down from about -4K
ohms). Different scales give wildly different values.
More interesting was a minus 0.4 to 0.43 vdc magic voltage on this
pin (that no doubt is messing up the resistance checks.). Tom had
0.35 vdc stray voltage if I recall from last night.
Now, understand, we are talking about a KPA100 just sitting in the
Panavise with no power supply anywhere close, BUT I have an
incandescent 75 watt swing arm lamp just 5 inches above the board.
When I turn this off, the stray voltage immediately drops and tapers
off slowly (as capacitors discharge?)
Start 10s 30s 1m 2m 5m
Vdc .33 .315 .279 .256 .235 .215
I wrote Tom last night I didn't think it was photosensitive, and was
going into the "stray rectified AC currents" camp -- but after
messing around with a maglite flashlight this morning I'm not so
sure. In fact, if I shoot a tight beam onto the ceramic cap of one or
the other power transistors, I can make the voltage immediately leap
into the 0.46 to 0.48 range. Brighter == more. (I confirmed this with
the AC incandescent lamp too.) It is pretty obvious the power
transistors are the source.
Now, if I turn off all the work lights, and measure in just ambient
room light, I get the correct (> 10K) value on + J3 and the
collectors of the finals.
Tom just pushed on with alignment and installation and all turned out
well, I am going to do the same. Both Tom and I were using bright
incandescents -- and the light has to be shining on the ceramic for
this to happen. Dunno what you get under a florescent.
So I think I'm going to be OK, but maybe all you EEs and physics
mavens can shed some "light" on what is going on. It is kind of
interesting and perhaps should be a note somewhere for future
builders if indeed it is benign.
-- Ward / KG6HAF
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list: [email protected]
You must be subscribed to post to the list.
To subscribe or unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Elecraft Web Page: http://www.elecraft.com
Also see: http://www.elecraft.com/elecraft_list_guidelines.htm