[Elecraft] "Mechanical COntesting"

[Jack Brindle]

Ah, There is a very valid point to this form of operation. The 
operation is only the testing exercise. The real challenge is in 
creating a system which can accurately copy code and handle exchanges. 
As others have pointed out, if it were so easy then computerized 
systems would have surpassed humans long ago. Just remember, someone 
had to sit down and craft all those cool programs and boxes you use. 
They need challenges too.

There are those of us in the hobby who's main enjoyment is in building 
and creating things. It might be CW copying routines, antenna and  
tuners, cool hamshack accessories, or entire transceivers. For those 
types, operating becomes a (wonderful) test exercise or icing on the 
cake to play with their cool creation. And, of course, some of us share 
those creations so that those who's main enjoyment is operation can 
join in the fun too.

It takes all types!

On Nov 11, 2003, at 5:41 AM, Sandy, W5TVW wrote:

> RE: "Mechanical Contesting" or maybe "High Tech Electronic Contesting"
> If you let the machines do all the work...what's the point?  REALLY!  
> I can see
> "aids" such as logging programs that require "manual" entry of data.  
> This allows
> dupes to be checked easily and no more broken pencil points!  A "CQ" 
> generator allows
> a mondane task to be eliminated.  The operator still has to use his 
> dexterity and
> senses.  I've heard of people using code readers, auto logging 
> programs, and
> algorythms in programming that will answer and give a report without 
> intervention.
> "TOTAL AUTOMATION"!
> Again: "What's the point?"

-Jack Brindle, WA4FIB
=======================================================================
MacDobs - helping to shift the paradigm for low-cost amateur astronomy.