[Elecraft] A couple of questions re: toroids
Tom Hammond NØSS
[email protected]
Sat Nov 9 08:33:01 2002
GM Kevin:
>1. In the SSB Carrier Null Notes by AB7MY there is an additional note from
>N6KR at the bottom which states (in part):
>
>There's some signal leakage *around* the BFO attenuator, which puts a
>lower-limit on how far down you can go. This leakage can be reduced by
>about 10 dB by changing the BFO inductor (L33) to a toroid (45 turns of
>#28 on a T44-8/90 , which can be purchased from our parts department,
>[email protected] ). This will improve carrier suppression on sideband.
>The toroid should be mounted securely underneath the PCB, and you'll have
>to re-run CAL FIL. (Write down your present BFO frequencies before making
>the change.)
>
>Is this a note related to older K2's using a solenoidal inductor for L33
>compared to the toroids that were used later on?
You are correct. This note applies to the older K2s which used a solenoidal
choke at L33.
>2. One of the mod notes says suggests RFC11 should be replaced with a
>FT37-43 toroid. The closest I can get to that is either an FT37-61 or
>FT50-43. Would I need to adjust the number of turns used if I used the
>FT37-61? Having moved recently, my ARRL Handbook is in storage so I can't
>check the toroid information and formula re: changes in turns from one
>core material to another.
The '37'-sized core was specified, I believe, due to its smaller physical
size, and since it mounts on the bottom of the RF Board.
IF the size FT50-43 core will fit physically, I'm pretty sure it'd work as
well.
73,
Tom Hammond N0SS