[Elecraft] bill to charge for e-mail
John Grebenkemper, KI6WX
[email protected]
Sat Mar 2 16:43:01 2002
This message is another internet hoax. Please see
http://www.urbanlegends.com/ulz/emailtax.html . I certainly wish people
would check rumors before they hit the send button and help propagate
another hoax. One clue to a hoax is that they almost always include a
PLEASE FORWARD note in them.
-John
KI6WX
PS. I have a nice chocolate chip recipe from Nieman Marcus that I have
received several dozen times over the last decade.
From: "Wayne Rogers" <[email protected]>
>
>
> I just received the following from KN6ZB. Thought it was significant
> enough to forward to you. Excuse me if you think it irrelevant. Just
> delete it. 73, Bill, W0OWY
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 11:38 PM
> Subject: Fw: bill to charge for e-mail
> Guess the warnings were true. Federal Bill 602P 5-cents per E-mail
> sent. It figures! No more free E-mail! We knew this was coming!! Bill
> 602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent charge on
> every delivered E-mail.
>
> Please read the following carefully if you intend to stay online and
> continue using E-mail. The last few months have revealed an alarming
> trend in the Government of the United States attempting to quietly push
> through legislation that will affect our use of the Internet.
> Under proposed legislation, the US Postal Service will be attempting to
> bill E-mail users out of "alternative postage fees."
> Bill 602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent
> surcharge on every e-mail delivered, by billing Internet Service
> Providers at source. The consumer would then be billed in turn by the
> ISP.
> Washington DC lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to prevent
> this legislation from becoming law.
> The US Postal Service is claiming lost revenue, due to the
> proliferation of E-mail, is costing nearly $230,000,000 in revenue per
> year. You may have noticed their recent ad campaign: "There is nothing
> like a letter."
> Since the average person received about 10 pieces of E-mail per day in
> 1998, the cost of the typical individual would be an additional 50 cents
> a day -- or over $180 per year -- above and beyond their regular Internet
> costs.
> Note that this would be money paid directly to the US Postal Service
> for a service they do not even provide.
> The whole point of the Internet is democracy and noninterference. You
> are already paying an exorbitant price for snail mail because of
> bureaucratic inefficiency. It currently takes up to 6 days for a letter
> to be delivered from coast to coast. If the US Postal Service is allowed
> to tinker with E-mail, it will mark the end of the "free" Internet in the
> United States.
> Congressional representative, Tony Schnell (R) has even suggested a
> "$20-$40 per month surcharge on all Internet service" above and beyond
> the governments proposed E-mail charges. Note that most of the major
> newspapers have ignored the story the only exception being the
> Washingtonian which called the idea of E-mail surcharge "a useful concept
> who's time has come" (March 6th, 1999 Editorial). Do not sit by and
> watch your freedom erode away!
> Send this E-mail to EVERYONE on your list, and tell all your friends
> and relatives to write their congressional representative and say "NO" to
> Bill 602P.
> It will only take a few moments of your time and could very well be
> instrumental in killing a bill we do not want.
>
> PLEASE FORWARD
>