[Elecraft] 817 audio better than K2?

Tue Jul 30 21:52:07 2002

You had better read below...

As I said originally, VAGUE!

73
Jim W7RY

I think the original post was mine, Jim, a couple of weeks ago and it
related to TX audio:  In an A-B test a friend said my TX audio on a new 817
was better than my TX audio with my K2.  So I am re-working the filters in
my K2.

Since I've been on the road for 10 days, I did not witness the evolution,
assuming my supposition is correct.

BTW -- I have more RX audio with my K2 than on my 817!

73, Phil

Jim W7RY wrote:

Although quite vague, the original post was about RECEIVE AUDIO on the
K2.Please be more specific in your posts!73Jim W7RY
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex Turner" <[email protected]>
To: "Jim W7RY" <[email protected]>; "Paul Cavnar" <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 817 audio better than K2?

> Seemed obvious to me if his daughter thought it was too loud it was
receive
> audio. BTW, I have the same situation, my K2 audio output from the speaker
> is pretty wimpy compared to my FT-817. I finally added the MFJ-616 with
amp
> and it helps the K2 as one would expect, but by itself; it's pathetic.
>
> Alex Turner N4BYJ
> S/N 595
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim W7RY" <[email protected]>
> To: "Paul Cavnar" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 8:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 817 audio better than K2?
>
>
> > Although quite vague, the original post was about RECEIVE AUDIO on the
K2.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list: [email protected]
> You must be a list member to post to the list.
> Postings must be plain text (no HTML or attachments).
> See: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Elecraft Web Page: http://www.elecraft.com
>
>