[Elecraft] RE: verticals...........
Ron D' Eau Claire
[email protected]
Mon Feb 11 16:09:33 2002
Stuart, K5KVH wrote:
> A vertical dipole system is ground independent and does not benefit from a
> counterpoise on your lot. See L. B. Cebik's excellent antennas site,
> <cebik.com> where he investigated this. A dipole is a complete
> antenna unto
> itself.
Right on!
I would add that there are times when a transmitter using a 'ground
independent' halfwave antenna still needs some sort of r-f ground. That is
when the half wave antenna is fed at the end, or any antenna is fed at a
voltage loop (high impedance point) with unbalanced feed.
The antenna does NOT need an r-f ground, but the rig does!
"Voltage fed" antennas got a bad reputation somewhere in the 60's or 70's
for "putting r-f in the shack instead of in the antenna". That is nonsense.
The problem is only that the antenna system does not keep the transmitter at
a low impedance point so the transmitter itself must be equipped with an r-f
ground. That can be simple ground rod if you are close to it, or a 1/4
wavelength long wire attached to the case. This is NOT part of the antenna;
it is only a way to hold the transmitter at r-f ground. So the "quality" of
such a ground only need be good enough that the rig doesn't appear "hot"
with r-f as evidenced by getting "bit" with r-f when putting the microphone
to your lips or seeing the SWR jump around when you touch the knobs, etc.
Ron AC7AC
K2 # 1289