[Elecraft] Re: W0AG; Need suggestion for diagnosis

[Mike Murray]

Gary,=0D
=0D
Thanks for the quick response!  As you probably expected, your suggestion=
=0D
solved the problem and all is now working correctly.=0D
=0D
Again, thanks and keep up the good work.  You guys really have customer=0D
service nailed and I'll do everything I can to promote your company and
products.=0D
=0D
73 and Happy Holidays,=0D
Mike - W0AG=0D
=0D
-------Original Message-------=0D
=0D
From: Gary Surrency=0D
Date: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:42:09 AM=0D
To: 'Mike Murray'=0D
Cc: CSinfo \(E-mail\)=0D
Subject: W0AG: RE: Need suggestion for diagnosis=0D
=0D
That range is very close to what is needed, and may work OK.=0D
=0D
We know the last batch of BFO crystals have higher Q, and do not move as=0D
far. I tested over 200 of them last week and found that to be the case.=0D
=0D
The current recommendation is to add 47pF to C174, and 120pF to C173 on t=
he=0D
bottom of the PCB if the BFO range is too small. Tests I did for Wayne sh=
ows=0D
this usually solves the problem. As long as you can reach 4913.0 at the l=
ow=0D
end, and 4916.5 at the high end - you should be fine. Wayne posted some i=
nfo=0D
about this on the Elecraft reflector over the weekend.

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/related
  multipart/alternative
    text/plain (text body -- kept)
    text/html
  image/gif
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed.
Please post in Plain-Text only.---