[EIDXA] 80 and 160 mtr antennas
Glenn Thorne
gathorne at traer.net
Mon Dec 29 12:50:13 EST 2008
I've used Inverted-vees over the years with marginal success for DX on 80. Next I'm going to try a Double-L. It looks very promising when compared using eznec. Much better for low angles than a low dipole/inverted-vee and maybe even a bit better than a vertical.
http://www.yccc.org/Articles/double_l.htm
73, Glenn /KD0Q
----- Original Message -----
From: Scott and Lisa Augsburger
To: EIDXA
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 6:28 PM
Subject: [EIDXA] 80 and 160 mtr antennas
I am wondering what everyone is using on 80 and 160 to transmit and receive.
I am currenting using a 80 mtr dipole at 60 feet. it works great for state side and Caribean but dead everywhere else.
I have been looking at the verticals from Zero Five and DX Engineering.
Let me know what works best for you
merry Christmas
wr0u
scott augsburger
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
EIDXA mailing list
EIDXA at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/eidxa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/eidxa/attachments/20081229/96c7035c/attachment.htm
More information about the EIDXA
mailing list