[EIDXA] 80 and 160 mtr antennas

Glenn Thorne gathorne at traer.net
Mon Dec 29 12:50:13 EST 2008


I've used Inverted-vees over the years with marginal success for DX on 80.  Next I'm going to try a Double-L.  It looks very promising when compared using eznec.  Much better for low angles than a low dipole/inverted-vee and maybe even a bit better than a vertical.

http://www.yccc.org/Articles/double_l.htm

73, Glenn /KD0Q
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Scott and Lisa Augsburger 
  To: EIDXA 
  Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 6:28 PM
  Subject: [EIDXA] 80 and 160 mtr antennas


  I am wondering what everyone is using on 80 and 160 to transmit and receive.

  I am currenting using a 80 mtr dipole at 60 feet.  it works great for state side and Caribean but dead everywhere else.

  I have been looking at the verticals from Zero Five and DX Engineering.

  Let me know what works best for you

  merry Christmas
  wr0u
  scott augsburger


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  EIDXA mailing list
  EIDXA at mailman.qth.net
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/eidxa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/eidxa/attachments/20081229/96c7035c/attachment.htm


More information about the EIDXA mailing list