[Dxbase] DXCC statistics after PJ update

[N3XX]

I have not run the updater here, but maybe it's necessary to initialize 
tables before you will see the correct totals.  I would give that a try if 
you haven't already done that.
Just making a guess on what could be wrong.

73,
Tim - N3XX

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Spears" <n1nk at cox.net>
To: <Dxbase at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 7:21 PM
Subject: [Dxbase] DXCC statistics after PJ update


> Thanks to San, WT3Q, for pointing me to the Updater version 1.05 which I
> assume to be the "latest and greatest".  If not, please let me know.
>
>
>
> I ran the updater this evening.  A couple odd things fell off the turnip
> cart.
>
>
>
> 1.        A handful of qsos including PJ2/K5WLQ for 20 Dec 2010 still show
> up with the old country ID, PJ2 vs the correct PJ2C.  is this because the
> update addressed specific known operations and not the general case?  I
> assume the corrective action is to manually update these.
>
> 2.       When I run Output -> HF Numeric Statistics -> DXCC, there is a 
> note
> at bottom left "Excludes Deleted".  This matches the option I have set. 
> BUT
> the totals are not correct.  For example, 6m Mixed shows 80 worked, 79
> confirmed.  This matches my total prior to the PJ exercise.  None of the
> Dutch Caribbean entities (PJ2C, PJ4, PJ5, PJ7M) are listed in the 
> Confirmed
> listing as it should be BUT the total should be decremented by 4 since I
> have not worked any since 10 Oct 2010.  I assume this will be true for 
> other
> bands but have not experimented with them.
>
>
>
> Jim/N1NK
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Dxbase mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Dxbase at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html