[Dxbase] Updater - Question/Issue

[Al Burnham (K6RIM)]

Carsten:

Yes, that PJ5/K1XM QSO and the LOTW entry would be valid for the/*OLD*/  PJ5.

The problem, at least as I see it, is that the Updater shows that contact confirms the/*NEW*/  PJ5.

I think Neal understands; take a look at his reply to my post.

73,

Al, K6RIM


------------------------------------------------------------------------

PJ5/K1XM on 10/10/10 at /*0253Z*/ QSO should still count "for the old
entity" St. Euthatius and a LOTW entry would be valid.

Hw?

73ss

Carsten, DL6LAU