[DXBase] Software
Phil Duff
[email protected]
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:43:18 +0000
At 07:44 11/27/2002 -0600, FireBrick wrote:
>Now do I have the right to purchase the software and use it on both of my
>inshack machines?
I feel that as a legitimate purchaser of a software package the licensing
should allow you to install and run the software simultaneously on any and
all systems you own up to some realistic number of systems for
home/individual use. For larger numbers of systems such as for businesses
purchasing additional licenses for a small incremental charge is appropriate.
>As for upgrades, You have the right to not purchase upgrades if you feel the
>new features are of no value to you.
For major new releases - Yep. But should we have to pay for defect fixes
in the package we originally purchased?
>But if 3 years later there are features you do want, you should realize that
>this version is practically a whole NEW program.
Nah - from my viewpoint as a longtime beta tester for another major ham
radio software package and software development testing professional most
"updates" are for bug fixes and relatively minor upgrades/additions in
functionality. There may be occasional major new releases but they tend
to be rather few and far apart as the development costs are high for real
major new releases. Bundling together groups of bug fixes and small
upgrades and releasing them periodically are not major version upgrades or
releases IMO.
Bug fixes and upgrades to major releases should be made available to
legitimate purchasers of the package at no cost. As a legitimate purchaser
of Win XP I have gotten many many upgrades and bug fixes without
cost. Other software follows this model as well.
>I presently have a 28 item wishlist. Hopefully some/most will be
>implemented. But even if they aren't, DXB will still be my favorite.
Hopefully so... DXB is my longtime favorite as well.
73 Phil NA4M
-. .- ....- -- -. .- ....- -- -. .- ....- -- -. .- ....- -- -. .-
....- --
Phil Duff NA4M [email protected] Georgetown, Texas