[DXBase] Another import question
Wes (N7WS) and Linda
[email protected]
Sun, 17 Feb 2002 14:58:28 -0700
At 03:19 PM 2/17/02 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi Wes,
>
>1. Yes, the CFM field is imported in the DXB Import. Can you imagine if it
>wasn't?
Yes, and that is the problem.
>2. The spots you see in refdata.mdb are some samples. If they bother you,
>you can delete them by clicking in the DX Info window, Spots tab, with your
>right mouse and select empty all.
I tried this, didn't see any entries and using "Empty entries" I get a
report that "No records found."
>3. If the QSO is confirmed on one machine and not on the second, then you
>must have selected the wrong database on the second machine, or you didn't
>actually save the QSOs when you imported ( i.e., maybe you had the trial box
>checked).
Not true. I believe that the problem is thus: If a record already exists
in both databases, the import may not make *any* changes to it. I'm
guessing that you probably look only at a few of the parameters (those in
the error log?) of the record before deciding that it is a "dupe" and make
*no* changes.
So as per my earlier example, JT1/K4ZW was already in both logs. In doing
the import from the database with the "new" data, ie. "CFM", the record
appears to be a dupe and an Error message is generated and no change was
make to the target database. JT1/K4ZW remains "unconfirmed" in the target
database.
I just tried this experiment:
1) Set the most recent QSO record in the "source" database to confirmed.
(This follows a previous import, so the "target" database has this record.)
2) "Log" a dummy qso in the source database. Set it to "CFM"
3) Import to the target database.
4) The previously existing record *is not* updated to CFM. The dummy
record is imported just fine and shown as "CFM."
It seems that importing is not a good way to update existing records. Right?
73,
Wes