[Dx4win] My misunderstanding or a bug?

Mike Cizek W0VTT mgcizek at gmail.com
Tue Jan 31 06:02:11 EST 2023


Hello Dave, 

Something similar happened to me a few years back.  The QSO was confirmed via LoTW, but the VK6 (I forget his call) did not have his zone info in his station location so LoTW, and hence dx4win, did not count it as a confirmation for zone 29.  

----
73,
Mike Cizek W0VTT

-----Original Message-----
From: dx4win-bounces at mailman.qth.net <dx4win-bounces at mailman.qth.net> On Behalf Of David Gould
Sent: Tuesday, 31 January, 2023 04:54
To: DX4WIN Reflector <DX4WIN at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: [Dx4win] My misunderstanding or a bug?

Version  9.0.9.1259

I have been using FT8 for a while, however recently, I have started using FT4 more often.  I am chasing WAS and WAZ.

I am seeing an anomaly on the WAZ report which is showing I need Zone 2 and Zone 31 on 12m.  However, when I import my log file into JT Alert it is showing I only need Zone 31.

When I look at my log entries for 12m Zone 2, it shows I have a worked and confirmed station for mode FT4.  (MFSK/FT4)  This does not seem to be being picked up by the WAZ report?  In the report generator I am selecting WAZ / Listing / DIG /  12m

I can provide screen shots if required.  Am I missing something or is this a bug?

I can't see how to positively search for other anomalies, (does it affect other reports?)  but I will keep my eye open to check where I can.

73,

Dave G3UEG

______________________________________________________________
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



More information about the DX4WIN mailing list