[Dx4win] Auto Upload to LOTW, etc.

[Kostas SV1DPI]

Hello Ray,

I apologize for my English. I agree with you. I would like to say that 
the most of the users who desperately wanted automatic upload, etc have 
gone. And if some of them are still stick with Dx4win will leave 
someday. I agree that Dx4win needs urgently to have these features to be 
able to keep the users it has. Much more features to increase the users 
number.

73 Kostas SV1DPI

Στις 7/4/2020 22:28, ο Raymond Benny έγραψε:
> Kosta,
>
> I like to thank you for all your support with DX4WIN over the years. I 
> too have been a loyal DX4WIN user for more than 25 years. However, 
> most the things you mentioned that DX4WIN users do not like or need is 
> not true, in my mind.
>
> I am hoping Paul will be working on some sort of automatic upload for 
> LOTW and WSJTX QSOs into DX4WIN. If not, I believe DX4WIN will become 
> stagnant in its use by not taking into account the changes that are 
> happening in making QSOs and logging them.
>
> Ray,
> N6VR
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 7:04 PM Dan Violette <danki6x at socal.rr.com 
> <mailto:danki6x at socal.rr.com>> wrote:
>
>     Kostas said:  " I explain that the most important thing in a
>     logging program is to be reliable (not loose my qsos) and show the
>     right dxcc entity and zone of every call. Dx4win does perfect
>     these 2 things."
>
>     And if it was not for Jim (AD1C) the accuracy would not be there
>     either.
>
>     Just an FYI from earlier discussion:  I use DXLabs at the club
>     station and we send in our LoTW uploads in bulk but just two
>     clicks to send (one to add requested QSOs, one to send).  Then
>     downloads are one click to download log match (that QSOs are
>     matched in both places) and one more to update confirmations. Last
>     click can be done whenever you want to check for more
>     confirmations.  I also think every QSO uploaded real time is a
>     waste of LoTW computer resources but they are so fast normally now
>     that is not really an issue.
>
>     Dan KI6X
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: dx4win-bounces at mailman.qth.net
>     <mailto:dx4win-bounces at mailman.qth.net>
>     <dx4win-bounces at mailman.qth.net
>     <mailto:dx4win-bounces at mailman.qth.net>> On Behalf Of Kostas SV1DPI
>     Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 1:23 AM
>     To: dx4win at mailman.qth.net <mailto:dx4win at mailman.qth.net>
>     Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Auto Upload to LOTW, etc.
>
>     It is normal that the most of the users still use dx4win are not
>     interested for auto upload to lotw, clublog and eqsl. After some
>     time I believe the majority of the dx4win users will be like me:
>     they will not have interest for ft8 as well.
>
>     Dx4win should be able to offer these 2 things. Of course
>     switchable auto or not. But this is what most of the people ask
>     today. I have showed dx4win to many new hams. I explain that the
>     most important thing in a logging program is to be reliable (not
>     loose my qsos) and show the right dxcc entity and zone of every
>     call. Dx4win does perfect these 2 things.
>     I am a CQ checker in my country. You can not believe how many
>     mistakes other programs have in zones. But all the new hams are
>     interesting for
>     ft8 and other digi and they don't like the way dx4win handles
>     this. Also they want to be able easily upload to lotw and clublog.
>     In combination that they need to pay for dx4win (not a few $) the
>     most of them go away.
>     This is not good for most of us even we are ok with dx4win...
>
>     73 Kostas SV1DPI
>
>
>     ______________________________________________________________
>     DX4WIN mailing list
>     Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
>     Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>     Post: mailto:DX4WIN at mailman.qth.net <mailto:DX4WIN at mailman.qth.net>
>
>     This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>     Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
> -- 
> Ray,
> N6VR