[Dx4win] LOTW and DX4WIN

[n4dsp]

And for you Bob, K8BL:


It has been some time since the last release. Been a DX4WIN user for Ten 
Years or more.
Are there going to be further versions or has DX4WIN been put on the 
shelf? Is the
architecture or platform so old that it's too difficult to continue? 
Should we continue
to patiently wait or learning another logging program which has more to 
offer.

For starters the steps one has to take to upload a log to LOTW is many 
and confusing.
This is well known. I downloaded and installed DXLAB. With two mouse 
clicks my log is
uploaded to LOTW.  It's amazing. Why can we not have the same with DX4WIN?
DX4WIN is still my logging program.

If time constraints are the problem for DX4WIN updates perhaps it's time 
to sell the company
and allow someone to further develop this great classic dx logging program.

john/n4dsp

On 1/5/2014 12:23 AM, R.T.Liddy wrote:
> Constructive criticism is good, snarky comments are not helpful.
>   
> A wish list of new features and/or improvements would be much better
> than empty complaints.
>   
> The support provided by Jim AD1C has been beyond excellent. I have had
> no problem whatsoever with getting thousands of QSOs into LoTW and
> eQSL - export them to a file, convert it in TQSL and send it to LoTW. It's
> a piece of cake.
>   
> Sure, there are a few kinks in DX4WIN, but nothing I can't live with. Overall,
> I think it's a fabulous program.
>   
> GL/73/HNY     Bob K8BL
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: n4dsp <n4dsp at triad.rr.com>
> To: dx4win at mailman.qth.net
> Sent: Saturday, January 4, 2014 9:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dx4win] LOTW and DX4WIN
>
>
> Zoran,
>
> You ask me to to give you and other's on this reflector some idea on what exactly is it that I am looking for.
> Let's start with you Zoran. What would you like to see and for what purpose? Or are you on the dx4win
> design team which implements these idea's into reality? Your concrete idea's on this matter instead of
> flaming would be nice.
>
> john
>
>
>
> On 1/4/2014 9:23 PM, WA7AA wrote:
>> On 04.01.2014 11:46, n4dsp wrote:
>>> Why is it and it's not just with this reflector when post's come out like mine
>>> expressing dissatisfaction with DX4WIN and expecting and willing to pay
>>> for revisions, the DX4WIN Addicts come out stating exactly what Erkki stated?
>>>
>> I don't want to get into the flame war here, but maybe you can give us some idea on what exactly is it that you are looking for as far as DX4Win changing and being "on the move"? Some concrete examples would be nice instead of flaming, since I am sure every one if us has a list of wanted features or such. I took a brief look of the DXLab and frankly, I don't see what is so revolutionary about it, aside from a few features that may be interesting to have, but are nowhere near making it the pinnacle of a logger you make it out to be. To draw a parallel to your Win 3.5 metaphor, I don't need a change that will take me from WinXP to Win 8.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Zoran WA7AA
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> DX4WIN mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:DX4WIN at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net/
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> DX4WIN mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:DX4WIN at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net/
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ______________________________________________________________
> DX4WIN mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:DX4WIN at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>