[Dx4win] LOTW and DX4WIN

[n4dsp]

Art,
I started this post with a question to the owner not to Zoran or You.
This is not some Santa Claus wish list with what I want for Christmas.
Therefore I am going to put my original again.

It has been some time since the last release. Been a DX4WIN user for Ten 
Years or more.
Are there going to be further versions or has DX4WIN been put on the 
shelf? Is the
architecture or platform so old that it's too difficult to continue? 
Should we continue
to patiently wait or learning another logging program which has more to 
offer.

For starters the steps one has to take to upload a log to LOTW is many 
and confusing.
This is well known. I downloaded and installed DXLAB. With two mouse 
clicks my log is
uploaded to LOTW.  It's amazing. Why can we not have the same with DX4WIN?
DX4WIN is still my logging program.

If time constraints are the problem for DX4WIN updates perhaps it's time 
to sell the company
and allow someone to further develop this great classic dx logging program.

john/n4dsp



On 1/5/2014 12:11 AM, Art - W6KY wrote:
> John,
> Zoran asked you a simple question of what you would like to see
> implemented in DX4WIN. You started this thread but haven't offered
> a single suggestion of improvements to DX4WIN.
> Let's have the list so maybe Paul can implement some of them if
> they are noteworthy..
> QRX
> 73, Art   W6KY
> www.w6ky.com
> .....................................................................................................
> Gleðileg jól og farsælt komandi ár from Iceland
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* n4dsp <n4dsp at triad.rr.com>
> *To:* dx4win at mailman.qth.net
> *Sent:* Saturday, January 4, 2014 6:57 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Dx4win] LOTW and DX4WIN
>
> Zoran,
>
> You ask me to to give you and other's on this reflector some idea on 
> what exactly is it that I am looking for.
> Let's start with you Zoran. What would you like to see and for what 
> purpose? Or are you on the dx4win
> design team which implements these idea's into reality? Your concrete 
> idea's on this matter instead of
> flaming would be nice.
>
> john
>
>
>
> On 1/4/2014 9:23 PM, WA7AA wrote:
> > On 04.01.2014 11:46, n4dsp wrote:
> >> Why is it and it's not just with this reflector when post's come 
> out like mine
> >> expressing dissatisfaction with DX4WIN and expecting and willing to pay
> >> for revisions, the DX4WIN Addicts come out stating exactly what 
> Erkki stated?
> >>
> >
> > I don't want to get into the flame war here, but maybe you can give 
> us some idea on what exactly is it that you are looking for as far as 
> DX4Win changing and being "on the move"? Some concrete examples would 
> be nice instead of flaming, since I am sure every one if us has a list 
> of wanted features or such. I took a brief look of the DXLab and 
> frankly, I don't see what is so revolutionary about it, aside from a 
> few features that may be interesting to have, but are nowhere near 
> making it the pinnacle of a logger you make it out to be. To draw a 
> parallel to your Win 3.5 metaphor, I don't need a change that will 
> take me from WinXP to Win 8.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Zoran WA7AA
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > DX4WIN mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:DX4WIN at mailman.qth.net <mailto:DX4WIN at mailman.qth.net>
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> DX4WIN mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:DX4WIN at mailman.qth.net <mailto:DX4WIN at mailman.qth.net>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net <http://www.qsl.net/>
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>