[Dx4win] Submission vs Logbook File Reports

[Jo,YC0LOW]

Hi Jim, AD1C
Many thanks for your information. I fully understand it, now.

If it worked that way, I'd prefer to make a Submission report to the ARRL 
DXCC Desk manually, which is based on Logbook reports, as an appreciation to 
the process of each 2-way 160 QSO that has involved many other factors.

Agn, tnx es 73 de Jo, YC0LOW




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Reisert AD1C" <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>
To: "Jo,YC0LOW" <yc0low at cbn.net.id>; "dx4win Reflector" 
<dx4win at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 4:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Submission vs Logbook File Reports


> At 03:21 PM 7/7/2007, Jo,YC0LOW wrote:
>
>>Tried to generate a 160m (only) DXCC Submission report and it's working 
>>OK,
>>now. But, in the file, some older (and confirmed) QSOs are not listed
>>chronologically as they are in the Logbook report.
>>
>>Instead of putting earlier confirmed station/QSOs dates/years, I wonder 
>>why
>>the software chooses to put different stations -in the same DXCC country- 
>>in
>>a later confirmed QSOs' dates/years for its Submission report? I am using
>>v7.03.16
>
> DX4WIN always picks the MOST RECENT confirmed QSO to submit.  So if you 
> have AD1C confirmed in 1995 and 2003, it will pick the 2003 QSO.
>
> 73 - Jim AD1C
>
>
> -- 
> Jim Reisert AD1C, <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us