[Dx4win] DX4WIN.CTY Release #24 - second call

[Alan Zack]

Yes Jim,
I guess I didn't say what I wanted to say correctly.
When I logged T32S it did come up as OC-024 but I changed it to OC-084 as 
per the operators instructions.
I was thinking this was a special trip to OC-084 in reference to your 
question if the Italian group was going to be activating any new T32 island 
groups this year.  That is, if OC-084 is a new activation or not.

In reference to AD1C wrote:
> It sounds like the Italians will not be activating any new T32 island
> groups this year.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Reisert AD1C" <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>
To: "Alan Zack" <k7acz at cox.net>; <dx4win at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] DX4WIN.CTY Release #24 - second call


> --- Alan Zack <k7acz at cox.net> wrote:
>
>> On 10/7/05 I worked T32S on OC-084.  Normally T32 is from OC-024 so not 
>> sure
>> if this is a new activation or they are just island hopping.
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> Each DXCC entity that is an island has a default IOTA.  There is no way to 
> make
> this callsign specific.  In other words, there is no callsign <-> IOTA
> database.  If you look at the country database, you'll see it on the first
> screen.
>
> 73 - Jim AD1C
>
>
> --
> Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
> USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us
>