[Dx-qsl] DXAC

[Ken Scheper]

Why not bitch at Congress?  Much the same...when they feel a decision should 
be made, it will.  I had G3JKI/5A for over 10 years and it "appeared" after 
new documents were presented, don't know from where, whom, or why...but it 
changed the status.  It's not our call....this is NOT a democracy.  Sorry to 
say, it's not up for a vote.

IMHO

Ken
WA8JOC


--------------------------------------------------
From: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra at sasktel.net>
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 7:41 PM
To: "'MG'" <mgreen at erols.com>; "'DX Posts'" <DX-QSL at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] DXAC

> Really?  As an ARRL member and in their DXCC program, why wasn't I 
> contacted
> for my input?  Let me guess.  Member opinions count for zilch.
>
> Doug
>
> I wasn't born in Saskatchewan, but I got here as soon as I could.
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> Exchanges and views on the DX QSL reflector are healthy but much more
> potent if we express them to the DXAC. Their recommendations influenced
> the ARRL Board of Directors who ultimately approved the new DXCC rule
> changes.
>
> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/DXCC/DXAC%20List%20Jan%2015.pdf
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> http://www.avast.com
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> DX-QSL mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx-qsl
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:DX-QSL at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>