[Dx-qsl] Remote station time-share for only $30/mo!

[Joe Subich, W4TV]

> It seems to me that - eQSL could easily add an "OQRS capability"
> where a human being had to look at the requests for physical cards,
> verify payment for postage via some method (like PayPal), and put a
> physical card in the mail.

eQSL already has an option to have a card printed and mailed.  ARRL
*will not accept those "cards"* unless they are personally signed
by the DX Station.  ARRL does not allow eQSL to act as an mass "QSL
Manager" - nor has eQSL ever claimed to be a "QSL Manager".

The real question is what would happen if N5UP claimed to be a QSL
Manager, changed the terms of use of eQSL to require users authorize
him/eQSL as their QSL manager, and the printed cards carried a mark
"N5UP/eQSL.cc QSL Manager."  Would ARRL accept cards from a QSL
Manager (even if the would not accept the electronic or self-printed
confirmations)?

73,

   ... Joe, W4TV


On 2015-02-02 2:06 AM, dx-qsl-request at mailman.qth.net wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:20:23 -0600
> From: Michael Carper<mike at wa9pie.net>
> To: dx-qsl<dx-qsl at mailman.qth.net>
> Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] Remote station time-share for only $30/mo!
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAKJep-BDJMboLnnEfzFw4QmgOk9OcF5R1y1SvNpY7b1Sm97zaQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> To the point Joe is making... at day's end...
>
> The ARRL is going to accept - for award credit - a confirmation that is
> obtained via LOTW or via the mail (or in-person, if you're close).
>
> It seems to me that - eQSL could easily add an "OQRS capability" where a
> human being had to look at the requests for physical cards, verify payment
> for postage via some method (like PayPal), and put a physical card in the
> mail.
>
> Mike, WA9PIE