[Dx-qsl] DX SUMMIT

[Steve Lund]

Wow, you are correct on that one.

The search function is a big step backwards - slow as can be.

Steve, K6UM

On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Peter W2IRT <lists at w2irt.net> wrote:

> I agree. I used the site to do quick filter searches on DX stations ("show
> me the last 100 spots of VU4 on 17m CW"), refreshing the page every 30
> seconds. Now with the new "Fisher-Price" interface, it's just too much of a
> bother. I was hoping for something vastly improved but they gave us a huge
> step backwards in my opinion. Note that I use the VE7CC software for
> real-time spot retrieval and filtering, and my logger(s) for alerting so
> for
> me DX Summit was a research tool only.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Regards,
> Peter Dougherty, W2IRT
> DXCC Card Checker/CQ-WAZ Checkpoint
>
> www.facebook.com/W2IRT
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DX-QSL [mailto:dx-qsl-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of k4hb via
> DX-QSL
> Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 9:31 PM
> To: DX-QSL at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] DX SUMMIT
>
> I'm not bothering with that., because I can't think of the first suggestion
> that would make the new site better. The only suggestion I can think of is
> to return to the old site, and I doubt very seriously they would take us up
> on that after after all they have done to create a new site. The only thing
> I can think of that would make them reconsider would be for their hits to
> drop off dramatically. But if what they did works, then it works.
> Personally, I don't care for the new site and won't be using it.
>
> This is sorta like the Hank Williams Jr. song I referred to in my other
> post. (When something is good, why does it change?) Also in the lyrics were
> why Coca-Cola changed their recipe. I remember that very well. The
> complaints didn't matter, but when their sales went way down, along came
> Classic Coke.
>
> I believe most of us are commenting here to test the waters to see if we
> are
> the only ones who don't care for "My DX Summit." It appears to me that most
> of us prefer the original DX Summit. (Our DX Summit) But I could be wrong,
> and this won't be the first time.
>
>
>
>
> 73, Hal K4HB
> http://www.k4hb.com
> http://www.k4hb.com/postage
> http://www.k4hb.com/redneck
>
>      (\____/)
>      / ¤ _ ¤ \
>     (   (oo)   )
>      \-..~~.-/
>       DX Pig
>     Oink Oink
>
> --------------------------------------------
> On Sat, 11/22/14, stevekz2i via DX-QSL <dx-qsl at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
>
>  Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] DX SUMMIT
>  To: "MG" <mgreen at erols.com>, "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw at verizon.net>,
> "DX
> Posts" <DX-QSL at mailman.qth.net>
>  Date: Saturday, November 22, 2014, 6:58 PM
>
>  I would suggest HELPFUL observations,
>  comments and suggestions be sent to the Summit owners.
>   Nothing works perfectly in the first few  days/weeks/months.  I'm quite
> sure they would love  to  hear  from you.
>
>  73 De Steve  KZ2I
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> DX-QSL mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx-qsl
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:DX-QSL at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> DX-QSL mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx-qsl
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:DX-QSL at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>