[Dx-qsl] Fwd: Re: Fwd: RE: IRC's

[Dave Haney]

Gentlemen:
All hams are supposed to be ambassadors of good-will. Let's please keep 
that in mind.

Happy (and tranquil) New Year to all.

73
Dave Haney
W3SJ
List Administrator
> Children, children, please take your tantrums private.
> --
> Dick Flanagan K7VC
> dick at k7vc.com
> Sent from a Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ron Lago <ac7dx at comcast.net>
> To: DX QSL Posts <dx-qsl at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 12:33 PM
> Subject: [Dx-qsl] Fwd: Re: Fwd: RE: IRC's
>
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	Re: Fwd: RE: IRC's
> Date: 	Tue, 31 Dec 2013 15:17:02 -0500
> From: 	Joe Subich, W4TV <w4tv at subich.com>
> To: 	Ron Lago <ac7dx at comcast.net>, "Bill Moore, NC1L" <nc1l at arrl.org>
>
>
>
> Be a dick Ron ...
>
> >From the DXCC Rules 12(d) in part
>
>> d) Blatant inequities in confirmation (QSL) procedures. Continued
>> refusal to issue QSLs under certain circumstances may lead to
>> disqualification.
> For me refusal, to accept IRCs is "blatant inequities in confirmation
> (QSL) procedures."  USPS and all other members of the Universal Postal
> Union are *required* to accept them even if they don't sell them so
> your refusal to accept them is a "blatant inequity" to those who choose
> that method of *paying for the QSL*.
>
> 73,
>
>     ... Joe, W4TV
>
>
> On 12/31/2013 1:41 PM, Ron Lago wrote:
>> So stuff it Joe!
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject:     RE: IRC's
>> Date:     Tue, 31 Dec 2013 18:32:43 +0000
>> From:     Moore, Bill, NC1L (ARRL Awards Branch)<bmoore at arrl.org>
>> To:     'ac7dx at comcast.net'<ac7dx at comcast.net>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Ron:
>>
>> Well, I've been here almost 23 years and I know the rules inside an out
>> and there is no rule in DXCC relaying to anything that it is our duty to
>> accept them.
>>
>> The only saying I am somewhat familiar with is that "the ultimate
>> courtesy of a QSO is a QSL". Nothing about IRC's
>>
>> Accepting or not accepting is strictly a personal decision.
>>
>> If he thinks there is a rule maybe you can ask him to direct you to it?
>> (I'd sure like to know!)
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Bill Moore NC1L
>>
>> Awards Branch Manager
>>
>> *ARRL - The national association for Amateur Radio^(TM)*
>>
>> 225 Main Street
>>
>> Newington, CT 06111
>>
>> Telephone: (860) 594 0234
>>
>> Fax: (860) 594-0346
>>
>> email:bmoore at arrl.org  <mailto:bmoore at arrl.org>
>>
>> DXCC Web Site:www.arrl.org/dxcc  <http://www.arrl.org/dxcc>
>>
>> Blog:http://www.arrl.org/awards-blog
>> Twitter: arrl_dxcc
>>
>> *From:*Ron Lago [mailto:ac7dx at comcast.net]
>> *Sent:* Monday, December 30, 2013 5:02 PM
>> *To:* dxccadmin
>> *Subject:* IRC's
>>
>> Hello Bill...W4TV is busting my B***s because I do not wish to accept
>> IRC's anymore and "Im gonna report you cause its your ham duty to accept
>> them" and the DXCC rules say I must accept them. Its become a HUGE
>> problem at the PO because they have no idea in most places what to do.
>> KU9C was nice enough to get rid of hundreds for N2OO and Joe W3HNK and a
>> few from me because the PO said they wouldn't accept them or gave a run
>> around. I may opt to you paypal but I really feel its my decision on how
>> I wish to do the postage.
>> Please comment on how the DXCC feels.
>> Happy New Year to all
>> Very 73
>> Ron
>> AC7DX
>>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> DX-QSL mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx-qsl
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:DX-QSL at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> DX-QSL mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx-qsl
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:DX-QSL at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>


--