[Dx-qsl] DXCC Study

[Ron Lago]

Maybe they live in a condo or Hospice or retirement home.. If my remote 
is 30 miles away on my other property..its not illegal and in fact its 
no ones business. I worked DXCC#1 from my property, and some from my 
remote property.
73
On 8/8/2013 7:15 PM, Rex Turvin wrote:
> Perhaps they could realize that there is a distinct difference between 
> the west and east coast. Due to the propagation differences (which can 
> be extreme at times), the US could be split into 2 different entities.
>
> Remote operating is a mixed bag in my opinion. It allows people to 
> work places they otherwise could not work from there home QTH (why 
> else would they do it), therefore it should be looked at differently 
> for award purposes.
> 73 NR6M
>
> ex: KF7NMD
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Rex Turvin
> www.nr6m.com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Ron Lago <ac7dx at comcast.net>
> *To:* dx-qsl at mailman.qth.net
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 8, 2013 7:03 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Dx-qsl] DXCC Study
>
> No difference..just whining. Maybe all mobiles should be stricken also?
> and dont go on vacation and work dx from another state (tic)
> 73
> Ron
> On 8/8/2013 6:44 PM, Scott Townley wrote:
> > Question (just interested in opinions):  what is the real difference
> > if I, living on the west coast, operate an east coast station
> > remotely, versus either (1) flying there and operating the same
> > station personally, or (2) driving my mobile to the east coast and
> > operating there.
> >
> > All three are currently equivalent per DXCC (operating within the same
> > DXCC entity), if I understand correctly.  Is there a thought that
> > somehow those scenarios should be distinguished/distinguishable?
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/8/2013 6:28 PM, Rex Turvin wrote:
> >> I doubt that we will see an overhaul. Most likely some small changes
> >> and recommendations.
> >>
> >> Personally, I would like to see some changes made in regards to
> >> remote operations. I think the awards should be stipulated remote/non
> >> remote. This will upset lots of people but seriously, this is 2
> >> totally different types of operations.
> >> 73 NR6M
> >>
> >>  ex: KF7NMD
> >>
> >>
> >> Sincerely,
> >>
> >>
> >> Rex Turvin
> >> www.nr6m.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > DX-QSL mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx-qsl
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:DX-QSL at mailman.qth.net <mailto:DX-QSL at mailman.qth.net>
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net <http://www.qsl.net/>
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> DX-QSL mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx-qsl
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:DX-QSL at mailman.qth.net <mailto:DX-QSL at mailman.qth.net>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net <http://www.qsl.net/>
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>