[Dx-qsl] OX/NA1SA rejected by DXCC desk

[Ragnar Otterstad]

What sort of documention is required ?   With CEPT licences there is NO
paperwork !!

73  rag  LA5HE

-----Original Message-----
From: dx-qsl-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:dx-qsl-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of Jim, KS7S
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 5:09 PM
To: dx-qsl at mailman.qth.net
Cc: 'kr0o - Jeff'
Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] OX/NA1SA rejected by DXCC desk

Had that same disappointment on my last submission too Jeff - only OX I've
worked so far - Jim KS7S

  _____

From: dx-qsl-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:dx-qsl-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of kr0o - Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 7:04 AM
To: dx-qsl at mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Dx-qsl] OX/NA1SA rejected by DXCC desk

The OX/NA1SA operation in May 2007 was rejected by DXCC desk for "No
documentation received".

Jeff - kr0o
  _____

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/dx-qsl/attachments/20090121/b568d033/attachment.html