[Dx-qsl] Re: 7O1YGF and 7O/OH2YY
Doug Renwick
ve5ra at sasktel.net
Wed Mar 14 09:49:36 EST 2007
Great, we have finally reached the pinnacle and end of this
discussion.
I tend to be suspicious of any organization that is not
transparent. From this I must conclude that any operation
acceptance by the ARRL/DXCC is subjective. They hide behind
a rule that is inconstantly applied.
These are some of the facts regarding 7O1YGF and 7O1A:
They were in Yemen.
They both had permission to operate.
They were not arrested and jailed for years.
They were not arrested and beheaded.
This further supports my premise that an exception could
have been easily made for 7O1YGF and 7O1A, but for some
'political reason' was not.
Bernie and Ron's acceptance of ARRL/DXCC decisions is an
example of 'blind faith', and not in a negative sense.
Thanks to all the private e-mails that supported me in my
quest for the truth.
The ARRL/DXCC has spoken. "You (7O1YGF and 7O1A) are
condemned to non-acceptance (hell) for eternity plus a day".
Enough.
Doug
Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] Re: 7O1YGF and 7O/OH2YY
Hi Doug!
The ARRL has a policy to never publish any documentations
received, if you need it please ask OH2YY.
>From a private e-mail
> Ron,
>
> Anything published tends to be accepted as fact when in
some
> cases is not true. If you have access to or have seen the
> original written documents for the 7O/OH2YY operation that
> satisfied the ARRL/DXCC, please share them with us. I
would
> be interested in seeing what OH2YY sent. I have asked
> Bernie the same question and so far he has not replied.
> Otherwise I will remain skeptical.
>
> Doug
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.8/714 - Release
Date: 3/8/2007 10:58 AM
More information about the DX-QSL
mailing list