[Dx-qsl] SWL data is correct, but

[DE1DXX at aol.com]

I agree with Rich (grey-line - but a little too late)
hearing on 80m is easier then transmitting. Did he mention what kind of  
antenna
he used? May be he is living on the country side and has enough space  for
a Beverage antenna in asia direction?
Anyway, with a good antenna, Japan - DX isn't that "hard" DX on 80m.
 
vy 73
Andreas - DE1DXX (SWL) - DO1DXX (HAM)
QSL-manager DL0KM / DL0M
 
 
In einer eMail vom 23.02.2007 15:28:48 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt  
nn3w at cox.net:

Possible  grey line contact on 80?  Time, path, and sunspot cycle was about  
right.  maybe a little late.

73 Rich NN3W

----- Original  Message ----- 
From: "Masa/JG1OWV" <jg1owv at jarl.com>
To: "DX- QSL"  <dx-qsl at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 9:17  AM
Subject: [Dx-qsl] SWL data is correct, but 


> Hello OMs, I  need to consult you.
> 
> Today French SWL card comes to me  through bureau,
> trying to confirm my 3.5MHz CW signal at 2005  WW-CW.
> Time is 0844Z and my QSO partner is HL station.
> All the  data on this SWL card are correct against my log.
> 
> However, I  am not a big gun running only 150W and never
> even hear any F signal on  80m until now.
> At the best of my knowledge, I suspect any French  station
> has almost no possibility to hear my signal at 0844Z on  bottom
> of November with WW contest QRM within Europe. 
>  
> Do you DX'ers recommend me to send my confirmation
> QSL card  to this SWL station?
> 
> Masa / JG1OWV



 
--------------------------------------------------
Andreas Ibold  - Alpen - GERMANY
SWL DE1DXX --- HAM DO1DXX
QSL-manager DL0KM and  DL0M
JO31GN DOK L14 CQ14 ITU28
Pse, do not forget me... I need YOUR  QSL.... :-)))
Okay in QRZ.com - look at my  QSL-card
--------------------------------------------------
all mails  scanned with latest McAfee Antivirus