[Dx-qsl] RE: IRC's

[DX-QSL]

Quoting from the message of Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:14:44 -0400 from
"Callaway Ed-eaim148" <Ed.Callaway at motorola.com> :

> I agree that 2006-expiry IRCs are, quite literally, not worth the paper
> they're printed on.
 

> I think that, if the IRC is the 2009-expiry version (having two fingers
> about to touch, framed in a postage stamp - the image inspired by the
> famous Michelangelo work adorning the Sistine Chapel:
> http://www.dailydx.com/2007irc.jpg ), it's okay to let them put
> additional stamps on them, pointless though it may be.
 
And don't forget the hologram - makes the new ones even easier to spot -
ignoring the slight colour differences

> But I can then repeat Alfred's question:  Does anyone know if having
> extra stamps on a 2009-expiry IRC causes problems overseas?
 
None whatsoever - certainly over here.

Graham [ who got an old one on Saturday, and even the dog wouldn't chase
it when screwed into a ball and thrown <smile>]

--