[Dx-qsl] Low Band ops use LoTW more

Vladimir V. Sidorov eu1sa at belsonet.net
Sun Sep 10 10:32:15 EDT 2006


It's a well-known law, and a terrible one. The lower you go, ther harder is 
to get a card. 40 m is the last band where you can get a last sign of 
gentlemanship. 80 m is a disaster, let alone 160 m.

This week has brought a brightest surprise to me, CQ0P has finally confirmed 
me PORTUGAL on 80 m... Several bureau and direct requests during a few years 
were completely in vain... And finally it pops up on LoTW. In the meantime 
there are just packages QSL requests coming from CT for contacts on 20 m and 
up, both via bureau and direct.

It only helps sometimes when contesters download their logs to LoTW. That 
was the only way I managed to get things like GM, GW on low bands...

Well...

73,

Vladimir VE3IAE - EU1SA

---






> Why are low band ops more likely to qsl via LoTW?
> And
> Why are low band ops more likely to qsl at all?
>
> I apologize for the report, for some reason my report to htm converter 
> goofs up linefeeds.
>
> http://www.qsl.net/w9ol/w9ol_lotw.htm
>



More information about the DX-QSL mailing list