[DX-CHAT] [Dx-qsl] DXCC application
Tom
n4nw at n4nw.org
Thu Oct 19 00:38:25 EDT 2006
Jim has it correct to an extent.
Those checking the cards are only "dumb" with regard to DCXX.
While there have been many complaints voiced here over customer
service - what I see is a consistent gripe that someone quite
directly told the applicant that there is a requirement on the manner
the cards are to be submitted.
In fact the computer program used to accept the input of for DXCC is
NOT as robust as many would think. The reason the specific order is
required is to speed the entries so that the inputting operator only
needs to change the band and mode information when needed. The band
and mode information is "sticky" in that it stays the same until
changed from the last entry.
I experienced this when I initially began using a computer for
logging DX QSO;s during my TU2NW operations in early 80's. All that
was needed with it was to enter the call sign, the band and mode
remained the same from one entry to the next until I changed it. The
method I employed just as the DXCC does is much more efficient for data entry.
All it requires is to take the time to follow directions
73's
Tom, N4NW
At 12:08 AM 10/19/2006, you wrote:
>Actually, I think it does matter. My impression is that they have a
>"dumb" (no
>judgment implied) data-entry operator keying in the credits. They
>start at 160
>CW, change the mode to SSB, key in those confirmations, they change
>the band to
>80 CW, then 80 SSB, etc. It's not as easy as our computer logging software.
>
>73 - Jim AD1C
>
>
>--
>Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
>USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us
Tom Gregory, N4NW
n4nw at n4nw.org
Check out local N4NW weather conditions real-time -->> http://www.n4nw.org
More information about the DX-QSL
mailing list