[Dx-qsl] Re: Missing dxcc credits

[Osten B Magnusson]

YI9OM is OK for DXCC, but after change of operator
the new one used the same callsign without license,
so there is a date frame, but can't remember when...
I think they did not have the same manager though.

73/DX de Osten SM5DQC    sm5dqc at areteadsl.se

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Warren" <nt5c at texas.net>
To: <dx-qsl at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 7:22 PM
Subject: [Dx-qsl] Re: Missing dxcc credits


> Steve KZ2I wrote:
>
>>Can't believe, with 2400 qsos in  cqww, that YI9OM is not authorized, but....
>
> YI9LZ was active too, but is also not approved - for the same reason, no docs.
>
> I'm a bit surprised that DXCC can't get at it another way: My understanding is 
> that YI9's are officially licensed by the coalition. Couldn't DXCC request that 
> list, and accept all officially licensed stations? Of course, there might be 
> some YI9's who are not legally licensed, but then they wouldn't be on the list. 
> Or perhaps the coalition might not be willing to give DXCC the list?
>
> John, NT5C.
>
> &quot;Don't it always seem to go that you don't know what you've got...till it's 
> gone.&quot; from Big Yellow Taxi (Joni Mitchell) but also true about QSL.NET if 
> more users don't open their wallets and help financially. Please contribute 
> TODAY !!