[Dx-qsl] But in the log
Kenji Rikitake JJ1BDX
jj1bdx at radio.email.ne.jp
Wed Feb 22 07:59:47 EST 2006
I think claiming *not QSOed* is an important report for the QSL manager
as well as claiming *QSOed*.
Many operators and QSL managers are using callsign-matching database
during contests and some are using those as well on the DX QSOs. I
think it's a matter of common sense of each person who finds the fact
that he/she is accidentally in the log even though the person should not
be there.
73
// Kenji Rikitake, JJ1BDX es JO3FUO
In the message <001b01c637ac$18ce3e70$0b01a8c0 at soteciloy9let6>
dated Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 09:32:25PM +0900,
Masa/JG1OWV <jg1owv at jarl.com> writes:
> do you think we should report to log manager about QSOs
> which we definitely don't make but appear in the log check?
> I believe wrong remaining QSOs makes QSL manager job nuisance
> to omit some of particular data at the time of printing labels to confirm
> only Q's we request.
> Another reason I ask is, you know, unfamiliar calls are tend to
> be rounded off to active ones in the benefit of log software which
> peditioners are using. I don't want to take over any possibility of someone
> similar to my callsign who made a QSO on a most common band
> in the last day of 3Y0.
>
> Masa / JG1OWV
More information about the DX-QSL
mailing list