[Dx-qsl] arrl.net/arrl.org mail forwarding/delivery problems

Kenji Rikitake JJ1BDX jj1bdx at arrl.net
Tue Oct 25 00:17:26 EDT 2005


I have confirmed that yahoo.co.jp (an Internet provider of major mailing
list and many other services) to arrl.net accounts have been disrupted
for recent few days.  I guess some other troubles have been happening on
the arrl.net/arrl.org mail accounts.

73
// Kenji Rikitake, JJ1BDX(/3)

In the message <6.2.0.14.2.20051021233624.031092e0 at mail.alltel.net>
dated Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 11:47:06PM -0400,
Phil Florig <W9IXX at arrl.net> writes:
> I had some recent questions on QSL card submission to the
> ARRL buro and as noted below they have had some problems
> with the e-mail service to DXCC at arrl.org.
> If you have submitted something via e-mail in the last 6wks
> or so and have not got an answer best to resubmit.  Bill and
> his staff are very good on responding.







> 
> I had some questions on the proper way to submit cards to the
> DXCC desk and hope you find some answers to your questions
> in the discussion below. Bill did an excellent job in answering
> and commenting on the proceedures.
> 
> Passed on for information purposes and hope this helps
> someone.
> 
> Tnx agn Bill for your answers and comments.
> 
> 73    Phil   W9IXX
> 
> 
> >Subject: RE: Questions on DXCC submissions
> >Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:44:43 -0400
> >From: "Moore, Bill,  NC1L" <nc1l at arrl.org>
> >To: "Phil Florig" <W9IXX at arrl.net>
> >X-Scanned-By: IEEE UCE Filtering Service (uce . ieee . org) on 
> >140.98.193.227
> >
> >Hi Phil:
> >
> >Yes, and I am almost afraid to venture a guess as to how many message I 
> >have missed over the last 6 weeks or so....
> >
> >Please scroll down and I will reply to each item shown...
> >
> >
> >----------
> >From: Phil Florig [mailto:W9IXX at arrl.net]
> >Sent: Fri 10/21/2005 7:29 PM
> >To: DXCC
> >Subject: Fwd: Questions on DXCC submissions
> >
> >Hi Bill/staff,
> >
> >I kinda thought that something was amiss as you generally
> >answer promptly to inquiries.
> >
> >Read that you were having some kind of problem.  So here is
> >the email agn..
> >
> >Tnx agn,
> >73    Phil     W9IXX
> >PS: One of the persons that was asking has since done an abbreviated
> >field check.
> >
> >
> >>Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:49:41 -0400
> >>To: dxcc at arrl.org
> >>From: Phil Florig <W9IXX at arrl.net>
> >>Subject: Fwd: Questions on DXCC submissions
> >>
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Sent this a little while back and have not heard back from
> >>you on this.
> >>
> >>Would appreciate your comments/answers for submission.
> >>
> >>Thank you.
> >>
> >>73
> >>Phil  W9IXX
> >>
> >>>Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:40:00 -0400
> >>>To: dxcc at arrl.org
> >>>From: Phil Florig <W9IXX at arrl.net>
> >>>Subject: Questions on DXCC submissions
> >>>Cc: pflorig at ieee.org
> >>>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I have been asked some of these questions at hamfests and club meeting as
> >>>I was a card sorter for the "W9I's" when I was in Chicago area with 
> >NIDXA.
> >>>Also at a recent hamfest one fellow tried to get field checking done and
> >>>I didn't anything wrong with his listing but got turned down as not in 
> >the
> >>>right sort order. Think it had to do with the multiple contacts listing.
> >>>
> >>>Note from ARRL website "DXCC Record Sheet" form:
> >>>
> >>>       Note:  Cards may be submitted directly to ARRL or checked by a
> >>> DXCC Card
> >>>       Checker. If cards are sent direct to ARRL, it is not necessary to
> >>> fill
> >>>       out this form. This form must be completed if a Card Checker
> >>> checks the
> >>>       application. In either case, the cards or listed credits must be
> >>> sorted
> >>>       first by band then by mode. If you fill out the form, supply all
> >>>       information as requested. Be sure to use the Entity name, not just
> >>> the
> >>>       prefix. Cards indicating multiple contacts must be placed
> >>> together. If
> >>>       cards with multiple credits are submitted direct to ARRL, a
> >>> notation must
> >>>       be made on each card indicating which credits are to be entered.
> >>> If no
> >>>       indication is made on a card, all credits will be entered into 
> >your
> >>>       record.
> >>>
> >>>In reference to this have questions that have been asked of me.
> >>>
> >>>RE: QSL card FIELD checking  "DXCC Record Sheet"
> >>>
> >>>1. Indicates cards/listed credits sort order is band then mode. (single
> >>>qso/card)
> >>>    a.) There is no reference to country order, so can we list in any 
> >order
> >>>        of country as long as cards are band first and then mode sort
> >>>        within each band?
> >
> >REPLY: As long as cards are band first then mode within band, further 
> >breakdowns are not needed.
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>>    b.) On this listing can we list the bands in any order?
> >>>        EX: 10mtr then 20mtr then 80mtr then 40mtr
> >
> >REPLY: Yes, the order of the bands is not important just that each band 
> >and mode be together.
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>>    c.) Within the band listing can we list the modes in
> >>>        any order?
> >
> >REPLY: No, once you sort by band, then sort by mode, for instance keep 20 
> >Phone, then 20 CW, then 20 RTTY etc.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>2. Indicates multiple contacts placed together (multiple qsos/card)
> >>>    a.) With multiple qsos assume there would be NO sort order?
> >
> >REPLY: Correct
> >>>
> >>>    b.) How do we list the multiple qso cards on the "DXCC Record Sheet"?
> >
> >REPLY: Basically, just as they appear on the card
> >>>
> >>>    c.) Where do we list the multiple qso cards on the "DXCC Record 
> >Sheet"
> >>>        sheet. Meaning at the start, anywhere, or end of the sheet 
> >where the
> >>>        single band entry listings are.
> >>>        EX: 10mtr band listing group
> >>>            20mtr band listing group
> >>>            15mtr band listing group
> >>>            multiple qso listing group
> >>>            80mtr band listing group
> >>>            etc.
> >
> >REPLY: It would be best either at the beginning or at the end. I would not 
> >set them in a group withing the other listings.
> >>>
> >>>    d.) If multiple qso card but are only listing one qso mode, which 
> >group
> >>>        should this card go in? EX: If one qso and for SSB and was on 
> >10mtrs
> >>>        and the card is for SSB credit where to put it?
> >
> >REPLY: If you only want one QSO than you can place it within the band/mode 
> >you are requesting. BUT, it is important that you place a post-it type 
> >note on the card to indicate the one QSO to enter.
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>>3. If the logging programs put out a list is that also acceptable for
> >>>submission
> >>>    and is there a standard among the different programs? I did not see 
> >any
> >>>    standard format in the ones I saw.
> >
> >REPLY: Some of the logging programers have contacted me and we discussed 
> >the required format. As long as they follow our requirements we have no 
> >problem with their reports. But, if they do not match our format we cannot 
> >accept them.
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>>4. I believe that for sending to HQ would follow the same type sort order
> >>>as above.
> >
> >REPLY: I think here you mean if someone sends cards and not a field 
> >checked application? Yes, the sort order is the main requirement 
> >regardless of the type of submission
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>>5. May I pass along your answers to this?
> >
> >REPLY: Yes, absolutely. While many do follow these guidelines many do not. 
> >I'll discuss the reason for this below...
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>>I checked the ARRL website under DXCC section and FAQ's and did not see
> >>>any particular answers there.  I believe that if these questions get 
> >asked
> >>>by the general members that needs to be explained somewhere.
> >>>If there is info on this somewhere that I missed, I apologize for
> >>>submitting and please point me in the right direction for the answers.
> >
> >REPLY: Please check there as I do cover this in some detail.
> >>>
> >>>If there is a guide that the field checkers use, maybe post it so the
> >>>members know how to list and/or send in.  Also if there were a "sample"
> >>>form showing these instances may help.
> >
> >REPLY: When they are nominated and are sent the open-book test, they are 
> >given a a guideline booklet that the test is based on. Card checking 
> >guidelines are covered in detail but they are advised that the rules, the 
> >FAQs, the guidelines etc are all part of what they must read and become 
> >familiar with.
> >
> >
> >
> >Now, why the sort order.....
> >
> >DXCC data entry is done in a FoxPro database. If you are familiar with 
> >databases you'll understand. We are set up that when we enter something 
> >the entry is retained on screen and the next card is basically 
> >overwritten. When the bands and modes are sorted properly the data entry 
> >people do not have to change all of these fields with each card. When 
> >entering, the callsign field changes with each entry as well as the date. 
> >But, the bands and modes may be the same so they can type the callsign and 
> >date then enter this entry not having to re-type the band and mode each 
> >time. When they get to the next band they make that change and the entry 
> >is retained until the next change. So, you can see that when properly 
> >sorted it takes almost half the time than if they were sorted anyway else. 
> >If someone submits cards alphanumerically by callsign each field has to be 
> >changed each time and it takes longer to process. While a few cards out of 
> >order may not matter, but think of those 1500-2000 cards submissions we 
> >process. (I actually have returned applications to be properly sorted).
> >
> >The manual data entry is the most time comsuming and costly part of the 
> >whole process and anything applicants do to work with us and sort their 
> >cards properly goes a long way to speeding up the process thereby allowing 
> >quicker processing time and helping reduce costs.
> >
> >73 and please let me know if I can help further
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Bill Moore NC1L
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>>Tnx for reading,
> >>>73    Phil  W9IXX
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>-----------------------------------------------
> >>>Philip Florig           e-mail:pflorig at ieee.org
> >>>115 Horne Rd.               (or):W9IXX at arrl.net
> >>>Columbus, NC. 28722         amateur radio:W9IXX
> >>>USA                         MARS:AAM4ENC/AAR4XX
> >>>     team member:AH1A-C6DX-CY0AA-J3A-KH8SI-VP2MX
> >>>        also:C6AXX-J3X-KH8/-T30,31,32,33P-VP2MPF
> >>>-----------------------------------------------
> >>>IPR Systems, Inc.           tel: 1-708-385-7500
> >>>11651 Mayfield Ave.         fax: 1-708-385-7515
> >>>Alsip, IL. 60803          email:info at iprsys.com
> >>>USA                              web:iprsys.com
> >>>    INDUSTRIAL POWER SUPPLIES & RECTIFIERS
> >>>-----------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> &quot;Don't it always seem to go that you don't know what you've got...till 
> it's gone.&quot; from Big Yellow Taxi (Joni Mitchell) but also true about 
> QSL.NET if more users don't open their wallets and help financially. Please 
> contribute TODAY !!


More information about the DX-QSL mailing list