[Dx-qsl] received today: SU9NC

[FireBrick]

Andrei, thanks for spotting my typo.

Yes, OM2SA is the correct route.

Chalk it up to old age...


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andy Chatalov" <zl1tm at hotmail.com>
To: <dx-qsl at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 1:39 PM
Subject: RE: [Dx-qsl] received today: SU9NC


> You probably mean OM2SA (not OM7)
>
> Regards & 731
> Andrei, de ZL1TM
>
>>From: "FireBrick" <w9ol at billnjudy.com>
>>Reply-To: FireBrick <w9ol at billnjudy.com>
>>To: "QSL List" <dx-qsl at mailman.qth.net>
>>Subject: [Dx-qsl] received today: SU9NC
>>Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:32:14 -0600
>>
>>SU9NC via OM7SA sae/2irc sent DEC-01-2004
>>
>>
>>-----------------------------------------------------
>>(c) Copywight 1997 Elmer Fudd. All wights 
>>wesewved. -----------------------------------------------------
>>
>>Bill H. in Chicagoland
>>
>>
>>
>>&quot;Don't it always seem to go that you don't know what you've got...till it's 
>>gone.&quot; from Big Yellow Taxi (Joni Mitchell) but also true about QSL.NET if more 
>>users don't open their wallets and help financially. Please contribute TODAY !!
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Check out news, entertainment and more @  http://xtra.co.nz/broadband
>
>
> &quot;Don't it always seem to go that you don't know what you've got...till it's 
> gone.&quot; from Big Yellow Taxi (Joni Mitchell) but also true about QSL.NET if more 
> users don't open their wallets and help financially. Please contribute TODAY !!
>