[Dx-qsl] Re: [Dx4win] Differences of versions

Bob Check [email protected]
Sun Mar 21 20:38:01 2004


I started with v4 went to 5 & 6 when it came out, I use many additional 
functions v4 didn't have(and I am looking for  more). I guess if a horse 
& buggy are all you need why buy a car?

I have had zero problems so I am not sure what your talking about saying 
"too many problematic changes"

Bob w8gc

Mel wrote:

>>I have seen far too many problematic changes
>>    
>>
>
>I am only aware of *one* problematic change... And it's only a problem for
>certain specific hardware configurations... And for me, that change was a
>definite improvement...
>
>I don't argue that there is no need to change if the present version
>suffices... However I don't think you should scare away potential clients
>with questionable generalizations about the stability of the upgrades.
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [email protected] 
>>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Shelby Summerville
>>Sent: March 21, 2004 18:03
>>To: 'Dx4win@Mailman. Qth. Net'
>>Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Differences of versions
>>
>>
>>"Wendell Wyly - W5FL" <[email protected]> wrote: "If you 
>>downloaded the demo of Version 6 and can see no difference, 
>>then you may be happy with what you have.  I would not be.  
>>Look at the help file in the demo version 6 and you will find 
>>over 11 pages that describe the differences starting at version 4."
>>
>>When I need to read 11 pages of differences, when what I have 
>>(v4.06) does all I need, why should I waste my time? I have 
>>seen far too many problematic changes discussed on this 
>>reflector, to convince me: "if it ain't broke, don't fix it"! 
>>Just my opinion!
>>
>>C'Ya, Shelby
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Dx4win mailing list
>>[email protected] http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
>>
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Dx4win mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
>
>
>
>  
>